• prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    We have no fucking time. They told us, explicitly, what they were going to do.

    Any halfway decent opposition party would have already had responses ready for each and every one of the executive orders that have been signed

  • Fisherman75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well the republicans are in some kind of hyperfascist accelerationist mode so I’m not sure exactly how much time we have to give them.

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    You’ve had 8 years, 4 of which you had control of the white house. You’ve had enough time. You squandered it. Are you really going to do anything useful with even more?

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      That dickhead got roasted for “concepts of a plan”, but just when you think the Democratic party can’t get any more pathetic they go and show how hopeless they are. AOC needs to break and start a party with Bernie.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Spoiler alert: it will be “send us more money!”. That’s what they always settle on.

  • Stamau123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Personally, I don’t want to give Republicans an inch on their claims they care about national security after their pardons,” said Murphy, D-Conn. “My hope is that we’re going to be down on the floor and on TV and back in our states talking about the danger of these pardons.”

    At least there’s someone awake at the wheel

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ve decided to rename the Democrat party to Republican Lite in order to appeal to more voters.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ideally people would have seriously punished Ford for letting that Nixon prick get off scot free and fought against the personality cult that was built up for Reagan, but if we’re talking about this century, the democrats should have come up with something as soon as the tea party lunatics got in position to kneecap public sector unions during the first Obama administration.

      It didn’t help that the occupy protesters were made to look like their message was a motley hodgepodge of pet causes with no real cohesiveness.

  • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s amazing that these assholes need time. Fuck off with the triangulation. It didn’t work in the election and it won’t work now.

    The only thing they have to do is take a principled stand in favor of people. Everyone has value (besides Nazis). But they are too interested in appealing to corporate interests and republicans.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Exactly. They need time to figure out a strategy where they can appeal to their base while also proposing contradictory public policy that harms their base. Judging by their performance in the past three presidential elections, this strategy will never exist but it sure as hell hasn’t caused them to do any sort of self reflection.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 days ago

      Democrats kept the filibuster around for this reason, right? They didn’t just keep it around to prevent progressive policy from passing, right?

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The second they try to use it, the republicans will nuke it, citing the precedent that the democrats did it first with lower court judicial nominees when they refused to let a single one pass, same way they did with scotus nominees when democrats dared to use it one time in protest against the stunt they pulled with Garland.

        Force Dems to reign in minority power the tiniest bit and use that as an excuse to remove minority powers entirely the second they’re in the majority is pretty standard Rep SOP now.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Then the only point in preserving the filibuster was to block progressive legislation.

          At least Democrats didn’t have to codify Roe or pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Trust me, I’m in agreement with you there. They really need to get their heads out of their asses and stop acting like the GOP fascists are going to follow the rules and act with integrity.

            And I’m being awfully generous here with assuming there’s a chance it isn’t malicious on their part, that maybe they really are just that incompetent to have missed the reality of this situation. Even though I don’t have much hope of that anymore.