• psvrh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      No less than The Economist uses the BMI (“Big Mac Index”) to compare economies.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I like how this has “Murrkans dumb” vibes, but this picture is intellectually far better than what average Russian thinks about economy.

      That said, 6+ bigmacs for an hour of minimum wage sounds very good. Actually it sounds like some heaven on earth.

      • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 days ago

        ‘Heaven is a place in Earth’ was, in fact, released in 1987 by Belinda Carlisle.

        Fueled by cheap Big Mac’s, no doubt, though the song neglects to mention them.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Good work Gamers. Your hardware will be more expensive, but at least Biden won’t be suggesting a non-enforceable DEI directive at the HR of those game studios.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Apparently Google searches for “what is a tariff” skyrocketed after Trump won

    Also “can I change my vote”

    There are already quite a few regrets it seems, and the right wing are gonna learn how tariffs actually work real soon

    I’m guessing the money they raise will also be used to help fund tax cuts for high income

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    look closer at everything you own. 99.9% of it will be 40% more expensive if you have to buy it again

  • bthalt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    At least prison business is booming when no one can afford to live even if they get paid. Land of the Free!

  • flemtone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Another good reason to have a home grown solution in your own country for game consoles outwith the US.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nobody will step up, because manufacturing electronics like this is incredibly expensive, and any new president in 2028 could instantly drop Trump’s dumb ass tariffs.

      So you’d be going into an expensive, already risky business, with an even bigger risk that one day the competition suddenly drops their prices by ~40% due to a drop in tariffs. Nobody’s gonna take that risk.

      And even if somebody successfully did take on that risk, they’d charge just under the price of the electronics that have the tariffs baked into the price, so congrats, no matter what we’d esentially be paying a ~40% markup on electronics, and that’s before accounting for all the businesses that raise prices even further than the tariffs to account for the drop in demand, and supply chain halt.

        • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          We’ve also already gone through the trouble of bringing TSMC stateside. Initially they weren’t able to round up enough skilled workers to be able to produce anything close to the quality of chips made in Taiwan. They’ve since made improvements, but we can’t hope to match the output either quality or quantity-wise due to differences of work culture and trying to replicate Taiwan’s processes that make bleeding edge performance possible without binning most of the production line.

      • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 days ago

        True. There are also parents buying them for their kids and a couple of other exceptions.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Glad we only buy game consoles from China. Can you imagine what these tariffs would do if a significant portion of our imports came from there?

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    And laptops, and phones, and literally every other electronic thing you might want to buy

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      People that can still afford stuff will be so cool. The hippest tech, biggest cars and newest kicks, everything will be uber exclusive. This is good for america because reasons.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        If that is truly their plan, they are dumber than we fucking figured.

        If a billionaire wants to buy a swimming pool, he needs a considerable amount of other people to be able to afford swimming pools or it it becomes impossible for him to get one at all eventually.

        To have a swimming pool, there needs to be an industry of specialized labororers who can manufacture and install. There has to be electricians who specialize in mixing water and electricity. There has to be people working the factories where the chlorine gets manufactured and bottled.

        This is true for every product that billionaires consume. You really gotta think that these people with all this wealth would have people on the payroll pointing this out to them.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          That is more of a millionaire problem. A billionaire can afford to fly the specialists and the materials in from Europe.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Party officials in USSR kinda managed to keep such an industry for their nice things. It’s not as complex as computers.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is good. Same way forest fires can be good.

        But those people thinking they’ll be the elite don’t quite realize how exactly.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        This is good for america because reasons.

        People with lifted pickup trucks can now go into even more debt, so they can flex on the “poors” (while complaining about their “economic anxiety”).

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think car industry regulations (ratio of gas per weight or something) are one of the incentives for production of such trucks. So again - this may eventually get better if “deregulation” stops being a curse. Not with Trump, of course.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 days ago

          Not to worry. If gas is a little cheaper while they fill up their tanks at the pump, they’ll be happy to pay [insert car financing company here] exorbitant amounts of money and think they’re winning

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Especially because every grift that trump has made, his shoes and the like, were all made internationally. Wonder who will pay for those tarrifs when he does the same?

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          Thing is all that crap can be stitched together by 12 year olds in Alabama instead of 12 year olds in China.

          I don’t think he can really comprehend a chip fabrication plant costing 10 times his entire net worth. He probably thinks that what they make in “Silicon Valley”…

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It won’t be paid from his net worth or from even the government’s budget.

            It will, if it happens, be expected to redeem costs based on the demand of the whole USA, which is, ahem, an obscene amount of money.

            Anyway, you don’t have to start with something like TSMC. Producing MCs for home appliances is already very cool.

          • tibi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 days ago

            I recently saw gamers nexus’ Intel tour. It was like seeing a sci-fi movie, it’s incredible how advanced the stuff they do is. I also found it incredible how much it takes to build a chip… It takes about 2-3 months from wafer to chip.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              7 days ago

              It takes about 2-3 months from wafer to chip.

              After spending 3-4 years building the factory and even more time finding and training staff.

              But, sure, tarriff the hell out of things that can’t be made domestically for (optomistacally) half a decade. That’ll certainly make it happen instantly…

              /fucking morons.

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                I’m sorry, but you people talk about making state-of-the-art chips, while in many cases something like year 1990 will do. It’d be a very ambitious endeavor too, but both realistic and useful.

                What they are doing will reduce economic competitiveness of the whole USA, but in terms of incentivizing domestic industries it will work. No miracles, but it will give incentives to what can be done quickly enough. And if we consider that electronics already are cheaper in US than in EU or in Eastern Europe, this won’t be too bad.

                I’m not a Trump fan. Just - what these people want to do is not without rational justification in economics. It’s a weird justification, of the kind USSR’s strategy of existence had, but then the reasons USSR failed were not in that part about self-reliance in strategic industries. One can argue it collapsed because it didn’t really achieve that due to administrative inefficiency, as in “went bankrupt”. It was exporting fossil fuels to finance the appearance of domestic heavy industries, which were not profitable. At some point that wasn’t enough money.

                • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  people talk about making state-of-the-art chips, while in many cases something like year 1990 will do

                  It still takes time to spin up a chip fab, even one with 30 year old capabilities.

                  And, since nobody domestically makes the machinery needed, that too will be subject to the import tarrifs and probable delays caused by the ensuring trade war restrictions.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      And now do some basic Google Foo and find out what is manufactured in Taiwan. If China gets it’s way, because Trump thinks Xi is cool and he’s a good guy, China will just waltz in - TSMC, ASML and Trumpf have some safeguards in place as far as I know to destroy anything valuable. So while you might want to buy shit, you can’t because the Cheeto and his cronies collapsed it.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        That would in long term be good. I’m serious. Keeping all your eggs in one basket is bad, and other than that - said one basket may, for example, not scale production fast enough so to keep profits, that’s basic supply and demand and that’s what oil producers do too.

        Short term, though, would be similar to a collapse of civilization.

        • nexusband@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Short term, though, would be similar to a collapse of civilization.

          Would it? Civilization doesn’t depend on bleeding edge high tech. Sure, it depends on tech, but look around who’s making ICs or basic processors that are in machine control panels and all the millions of appliances. AMD, Intel, Qualcomm, Broadcom do the “heavy lifting” in terms of monetary value, but in overall quantity? Samsung, SK Hynix, STMicroelectronics, Infineon, Sony, Renesas and NXP are the ones that make the world go round. Infineon is German, NXP is Dutch, Renesas is Japanese, STMicroelectronics is Swiss. The thing that’s really going to hurt is Foxconn, but they are probably global enough to withstand that. There’s also many, many more local players. BOSCH for example has very high capacities for everything up to 80 Nanometers (Pentium 3/4, Athlon 64…)

          Civilization would crack, sure - but i don’t think it would collapse. Society on the other hand…that’s a different paper.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Society on the other hand…that’s a different paper.

            I meant that too. But would actually be interesting, if electronics around us would still be a normal thing, but smartphones changing every year and carelessly used computing power will not. I think it would feel like waking up from a fever dream.

            • nexusband@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I mean, “change” per se isn’t necessarily something bad. Meaning, stuff needs to last longer (again) in those cases. Planned Obsolescence is a real thing, that’s however only economical as long as raw materials are relatively cheap. But it would be nice if companies just did that change, instead of being forced in to it…

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                The issue is - tariffs and regulations already exist and force them the other way in fact. So the matter of purity doesn’t suffer here. Relatively.