Video footage broadcast Wednesday by Al Jazeera shows Israeli soldiers gunning down two Palestinians on the coast of northern Gaza, even as one of them waves what appears to be a piece of white fabric. The video then shows Israeli soldiers burying the bodies with a bulldozer.

Richard Falk, former United Nations special rapporteur on the human rights situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, toldAl Jazeera that the footage provides “vivid confirmation of continuing Israeli atrocities” and spotlights the “unambiguous character of Israeli atrocities that are being carried out on a daily basis.”

“The eyes and ears of the world have been assaulted in real-time by this form of genocidal behavior,” said Falk. “It is a shocking reality that there has been no adverse reaction from the liberal democracies in the West. It is a shameful moment.”

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    In what way is it immaterial whether we source our oil from there or not? Seems to be the very crux of the matter to me.

    because our interest in the region isn’t for oil for ourselves, it’s influence over all the nations in the region, and that entire region revolves around the power that oil grants those countries.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Uh huh. I think you’re just drifting into conspiracy theory land now. Regardless, our large amount of aid to Egypt give us significant influence over the Suez, and our multitude of other alliances and bases gives plenty of power for that, if it actually was the goal. We could lose any three and still have massive power projection through the region.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lol a third of the world’s oil is produced in the middle east, and most of it is moved across boarders through pipelines and by sea.

        I don’t think it’s conspiratorial to say that is extremely valuable, even if it’s only marginally less-so after the shale revolution. Hell, the entire current phase of conflict in the red sea was because Yemeni Houthies, (a relatively tiny military power) were targeting trade routes.

        Whatever you want to believe I guess, I’m pretty bored with whatever this is.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes it’s absolutely valuable. Just not to us. The trade routes you’ve mentioned are far more so, since that impacts the global economy. We’d be a poor global military superpower if we had a plethora of bases everywhere except one of the most concentrated shipping regions on the whole planet.

          Just so long as you recognize that perhaps Israel has no special military significance anymore, and hasn’t for over a decade now. It’s more religious than geopolitical at this point. Very different from how things were 50 years ago.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just so long as you recognize that perhaps Israel has no special military significance anymore, and hasn’t for over a decade now. It’s more religious than geopolitical at this point. Very different from how things were 50 years ago.

            fucking LMAO. They’re a western-aligned nuclear superpower with the 4th strongest military in the region, behind 2 other (far, FAR bigger) western-aligned countries. That, and they occupy a large stretch of the Mediterranean sea in front of a nexus of oil pipelines and trade ports.

            You do you though.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              But none of that is unique. We have nukes that can touch every corner of the globe. We have a much larger military than them. We have Egypt and Turkey on either side of them.

              I’m sorry for challenging your pre-existing perceptions, but history kept moving.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                But none of that is unique. We have nukes that can touch every corner of the globe.

                it doesn’t matter if “we” have nukes, it matters that the power occupying that strategic position has it. The US isn’t going to launch nukes if Iran marches into Israel, but Iran isn’t going to march into Israel so long as they have them themselves. You said it yourself: it is a vulnerable position for global trade. The US stands to loose the most, and all our opposition to gain the most, by a disruption there.

                I don’t even know why you’re still harping on this, it seems pretty unimportant even by your own apparent worldview.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  If Israel wasn’t there, the US strategic position in the Middle East would not change. It would not be noticeably weaker in any way.

                  As I said before, I’m a stickler for accuracy. I’m not the only one that keeps discussing it, at any rate. And this vassal state meme irritates me. It’s just vidya game meme bullshit, and when challenged, all you folks that like it seem to have is the most nebulous answers that are half-wrong.

                  edit: Actually, if Israel wasn’t there, our strategic position in the Middle East would get stronger. Israel is weakening us by making us so vulnerable to legitimate criticism.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    It would not be noticeably weaker in any way.

                    If it were true that Israel means nothing to our strategic objectives, and that our continued alliance weakens us to criticism, then why the fuck would the US continue to support them? Israel offers them influence over the region, otherwise there’s no point in supporting their genocide. I would be seriously concerned if the US continued to support them if they didn’t have strategic interests through them. I’d love for you to venture a guess as to why you think the US continues supporting Israel, if you think that we’d actually be better off if we didn’t have them as an ally.

                    Make it make sense. You’re certainly not a stickler for internal consistency, that’s for sure.