Video footage broadcast Wednesday by Al Jazeera shows Israeli soldiers gunning down two Palestinians on the coast of northern Gaza, even as one of them waves what appears to be a piece of white fabric. The video then shows Israeli soldiers burying the bodies with a bulldozer.

Richard Falk, former United Nations special rapporteur on the human rights situation in the occupied Palestinian territories, toldAl Jazeera that the footage provides “vivid confirmation of continuing Israeli atrocities” and spotlights the “unambiguous character of Israeli atrocities that are being carried out on a daily basis.”

“The eyes and ears of the world have been assaulted in real-time by this form of genocidal behavior,” said Falk. “It is a shocking reality that there has been no adverse reaction from the liberal democracies in the West. It is a shameful moment.”

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But none of that is unique. We have nukes that can touch every corner of the globe. We have a much larger military than them. We have Egypt and Turkey on either side of them.

    I’m sorry for challenging your pre-existing perceptions, but history kept moving.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      But none of that is unique. We have nukes that can touch every corner of the globe.

      it doesn’t matter if “we” have nukes, it matters that the power occupying that strategic position has it. The US isn’t going to launch nukes if Iran marches into Israel, but Iran isn’t going to march into Israel so long as they have them themselves. You said it yourself: it is a vulnerable position for global trade. The US stands to loose the most, and all our opposition to gain the most, by a disruption there.

      I don’t even know why you’re still harping on this, it seems pretty unimportant even by your own apparent worldview.

      • Carrolade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        If Israel wasn’t there, the US strategic position in the Middle East would not change. It would not be noticeably weaker in any way.

        As I said before, I’m a stickler for accuracy. I’m not the only one that keeps discussing it, at any rate. And this vassal state meme irritates me. It’s just vidya game meme bullshit, and when challenged, all you folks that like it seem to have is the most nebulous answers that are half-wrong.

        edit: Actually, if Israel wasn’t there, our strategic position in the Middle East would get stronger. Israel is weakening us by making us so vulnerable to legitimate criticism.

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It would not be noticeably weaker in any way.

          If it were true that Israel means nothing to our strategic objectives, and that our continued alliance weakens us to criticism, then why the fuck would the US continue to support them? Israel offers them influence over the region, otherwise there’s no point in supporting their genocide. I would be seriously concerned if the US continued to support them if they didn’t have strategic interests through them. I’d love for you to venture a guess as to why you think the US continues supporting Israel, if you think that we’d actually be better off if we didn’t have them as an ally.

          Make it make sense. You’re certainly not a stickler for internal consistency, that’s for sure.

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t know, I think I’ve been quite consistent throughout.

            Asides the reasons I already gave you, that you seem to have suddenly forgotten, of both being ethnically diverse democracies with a long tradition of mutual support, there’s actually a much bigger reason:

            The US has a vast number of global military alliances. Not just NATO, but also independent alliances with countries like Morocco, and larger bloc alliances, like the Rio Pact with most of South America. In many ways, we under-write global security, a concept sometimes referred to as Pax Americana. That entire system gets put on shakier ground if we suddenly turn around and betray our obligations to any one of those countries in the midst of a war. However we may see it from our own perspectives over here, Israel is very much fighting a war, a nearly total war even. Since we have promised our support, it would take quite a bit to force us to backtrack on that.

            Additionally, it’s important to remember the US has no history of dropping an ally just for war crimes, and to the contrary, continued to support Turkey despite their own ethnic cleansing of their Kurds, which are actually another US ally entirely. So, the stuff certainly gets complicated sometimes.

            Also, don’t forget the wishes of the American people. Until more recently, most supported the Israelis. They have particularly strong support on the religious right, so that’s another, probably more minor consideration.

            So, three reasons, yes? Tradition, is one. Maintaining a reputation for honoring global security commitments, is two, and the biggest. Domestic politics is three.

            Against those, all you seem to have is some mistaken assumption that the US drops allies for war crimes. Which is just nonsense. We sometimes commit war crimes, I assume you were aware of that.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Tradition, is one

              That’s not a reason to do anything, it’s simply a reason not to think about it

              Maintaining a reputation for honoring global security commitments

              Those commitments mean nothing if they are indifferent to abuses, that goes both ways.

              Domestic politics

              Try again. US support for israel’s military action in Gaza is at 36%. If this was real, it’d be an explanation as to why we stopped support.

              Against those, all you seem to have is some mistaken assumption that the US drops allies for war crimes. Which is just nonsense. We sometimes commit war crimes, I assume you were aware of that.

              Because they have material benefits to our interests.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Just because you personally do not think a reason is important, like say, global security guarantees, does not mean Biden’s State Dept doesn’t. And their opinion matters far more than yours. Similar with our history of cooperation.

                Your 36% is from recently. You’ll note it was not at that level a few months ago. You may also have noticed that Biden’s support of Israel has been steadily declining, we have recently stopped protecting them in the UN Security Council, for instance.

                You can’t describe their material benefits to our interests in any way I haven’t already refuted. Position? Unnecessary when they are surrounded by our bases. Military contribution? Minor. Were there others? I forget.

                I’m beginning to get the impression you’re just petulantly arguing at this point. You haven’t said anything about Turkey’s history with Kurds, or our long history of supporting other war criminals.