• intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          “It’s simple. We implant the chip. No matter how hard you try, you can’t stand up or walk right. You go through the process, then we remove the chip, and we take 10% of your benefits. Are we clear?”

      • flicker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I work with a lot of disabled people and while obviously my sample size isn’t large enough to write a paper, the ones capable of understanding consent all think this is a terrible, terrible idea.

        • Voran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t blame them. I can’t imagine voluntarily getting brain surgery unless it was life or death.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Being disabled in some area really makes you think “I had better take care of what I have left” rather than “what are my options for modifying and upgrading what is left?”

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is actually a strong feeling in much of the deaf/heard of hearing community against cochlear implants because it is “othering” them in the process.

          • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Which is stupid because they were “othered” by their physical disability and are being returned to the fold by having that ability restored.

            Also it’s a minority of deaf egoists who think they’re special because they lack normal capacity and turned their disability into their personality, not some strong feeling in much of the community.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            Just because a culture adopts a narrative doesn’t mean it’s the only functional narrative.

            It’s just as feasible for someone to think “hey new sense, fuckin sweet!” or even “Hey new sense, nah I’m good”, and in both responses not find any insult at all in the offer.

          • Lmaydev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’d find it hard to believe people paralyzed from the neck down would share similar views.

            • flicker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Again it’s not a huge pool, but one. One paralyzed lady who thinks this an atrocious idea. But I bet its more than you’ve asked personally!

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’ve healed various parts of myself that have been fucked up, mostly mentally and emotionally, and when I’ve found myself normally able, the first reaction I have is grief. For all the years before I even knew such things existed.

                  I steer, on purpose, into gratitude, and I take what I can get. But there’s a little secondary voice that wants to be bitter and hold it against people who had the ability while young.

                  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    As someone with physical disabilities I grieve the life I had before them and the things in life I won’t be able to do in the future. Like spend a full lifetime with my kids.

                    Bitterness is not a reason to avoid a cure if one is available.

                • flicker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I lack the eloquence to describe the look on her face when she found out about it. But her answer was, “Oh, great, so I can trade in the problems I have now for new ones we can’t even accommodate yet!”

                  She’s very much an enemy you know type of person.

          • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            All the more reason to not let someone fuck with the last bit that works lest they set your brain on fire with nerve damage.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        11 months ago

        “I can finally walk, but I really enjoy the bold rich flavor of PrimeCorp nutrition bar.”

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah, everyone would. PrimeCorp stock would go through the roof, not least of all because of their delicious nutrition bars. So much value would be delivered to the shareholders, can you imagine it!?

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Who gives a shit if I could walk again. I wouldn’t care who’s profiting off of it.

              This is frankly a ridiculous position.

              Let’s not allow people to walk as someone might make money. The horror.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s not that serious, we’re just cracking jokes on the internet. Of course we’d all pick walking, even if we suddenly got an insatiable hunger for delicious, satisfying PrimeCorp nutrition bars. The nutrition bar with legs!

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Do you think someone in a wheelchair so much lesser a person that you automatically assume free access to their brain is adequate payment for legs? People who can’t walk still have lives, and agency, and choices. This would be a choice, for everyone. You would choose walking because you’ve never had to compensate for losing it.

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’d 100% give it to get rid of my physical disabilities.

              I also did specify paralyzed from the neck down which I assume gives people less agency.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        This kind of emerging technology preys upon those people’s hopes of living a normal life again. I just recently saw a YouTube video of people who got implants to cure blindness (with a glasses-like device to bridge the gap) and once the company that produces them went out of business they ceased support for their units that were inevitably going to fail as all hardware does.

        Elon Musk and Neuralink is no different. They’re rushing this tech to market and they know it. High likelihood of it becoming abandonware, but improving the lives of their patients was never the goal. Making money is the goal.

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          All the advancements will still most likely help others down the line.

          The tech exists now and that’s still a big leap forward even if that particular company fucked people.

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Yeah pretty much every country except America runs their healthcare that way.

              A big advantage of socialised medicine is the system has huge buying power and can enforce things like this when making contracts.

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The fucking-people-over part is NOT a necessary part of the tech! You can have tech that gets stably supported with adequate safeguards in place to make sure patients get everything they need to keep them safe and working for the rest of their life–safeguards enforced by government mandates. Those are policy issues that we already know how to solve, we just don’t, because we let tech companies do whatever the hell they want.

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah most places except America this is what would happen. It’s a big advantage of nationalised medicine.

      • Dud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Probably the drivers I’d want to try to maintain and get working the least.

      • psmgx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        78 developers across the globe. No one can agree on direction and half drop out in 3 months to fork it. Several forks happen and they all fail, and a few survive but become mutually incompatible.

        You download a poorly tested update via brain apt-get and lose the ability to use the letter k.

        A successful fork takes off and everyone uses it but then IBM buys it. Now big blue owns your brain and charges insane licenses fees.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s already a company doing this with fall protection vests (airbags for cyclists basically). If you stop paying it stops working.

            If I was a CEO personally I would not want my company to make a product intended to stop working and increase the risk of serious injury or death if the customer stops the subscription, but I’m not a super smart tech guy so I’m sure it’ll work out fine for them.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t feel like advertisements in general are that much different. Constant assault, every medium, weaponized brain washing. I bet that given a cue you could perfectly hum the tunes of at least a hundred or so jingles that you weren’t aware of infesting you brain.