• rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The violation of consent itself is another form of harm, as we see in cases of r***. The scenario you proposed would still be causing more harm than the voluntary method.

    • Poplar?@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Violating someone’s bodily autonomy causes harm but I don’t think consent itself exists in utilitarianism. “Dont do stuff to people that they dont consent to” is a rule. I think it’s clear that the mental anguish of having your extra kidney taken would be less than all the pain avoided by the child not going through a slow and painful death, and all the happiness they gain in the chance to a life they can now live.

      • rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Consent certainly can be a factor in utilitarian analyses, but it depends on the philosopher how strongly it is weighted. I’m not a strict utilitarian myself; my original point was to show that the premise of the meme (and in general, public understanding of utilitarianism) focuses too much on an extreme, comically oversimplified view of utility analysis.