thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 day agoShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?message-squaremessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down14
arrow-up142arrow-down1message-squareShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squareremotelove@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·23 hours agoSorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph. Good try though. ;)
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·23 hours agoHah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍 As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
minus-squareremotelove@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·23 hours agoI actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.) And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.
Sorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph.
Good try though. ;)
Hah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍
As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
I actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.)
And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.