Summary

The Pentagon warns that a potential government shutdown by Friday will halt military paychecks during the holidays unless Congress reaches a funding agreement.

Troops, including overseas and reserve forces, must continue reporting for duty unpaid, with federal civilian workers also affected.

The issue stems from House Republicans abandoning a spending plan after criticism from Donald Trump and Elon Musk over unrelated provisions, leaving lawmakers scrambling for an alternative.

Military leaders caution that this funding lapse will cause widespread disruptions, though such outcomes have been partially mitigated in past shutdowns.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Just deploy them. Then they won’t need their pay. I’m sure the US can find something for them to do.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I know when I’m planning a hostile takeover of a world government I always piss off the military first thing. even better if you can do it by taking away their paychecks for Christmas.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you voted for xelon, you deserve this. And the people around you who didn’t vote for him get to shove it in your face and blame you for their pain.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a funny thought that the secret service is supposed to give their life to protect the president and the president elect. And now they are supposed to do so without pay.

      That’s a bold move cotton.

  • Heikki@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    From what the right Wings news sources are saying, “It’s the Dens fault the majority/ruling party can not get thier shit together”

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean did the Republicans give a fuck any of the other times they lead a government shutdown?

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They’ve been using it as a cudgel for years. Don’t want to pass our objectively ridiculous budget proposal? Fuck you, shut it all down. They plan this in advance. As long as nobody budges an inch on anything they can reliably use federal workers as hostages in their “negotiations”.

  • theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hopefully it helps the troops make the right call when the orange VP and President Musk declare marshall law.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Pretty sure they’ve always gotten paid after the fact. As long as everyone has plenty of savings to fall back on and this doesn’t happen over any major gift giving holidays …… clearly one of those disconnected from reality situations, where the people making this decision have the means for that to not be serious, even if they let themselves be affected

  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Oh god I hope so. Recruitment is already falling fast in the US. No one wants to be soldiers. Which good, USA needs to stop being a warmongering nation. Less soldiers equals less wars, it’s a simple numbers game. If you ALSO take away the paychecks of the few stupid enough to be loyal to this violent nation, well that’s it, we’re done.

    *Edit: A literal starve the beast.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately a smaller volunteer army does not mean less war, it just increases the odds of conscription if we do get into a conflict.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, but you do need people to man the nearly 800 military bases the US has around the globe and I’m sure pretty much everyone except the neoconservatives would like to see many of those shut down or transferred to be run purely by their host government

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We can’t fight wars with only drones any more than we could fight them with only airpower. At some point, there are always boots on the ground.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Less soldiers equals less wars, it’s a simple numbers game.

      You underestimate Republican willingness to fight wars with low/no oversight civilian contractors.

  • blarth@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s ok, they will pump AFN full of bullshit lies indicating Democrats somehow did this instead of Republicans.