Automotive research firm finds that Tesla has higher frequency of deadly accidents than any other car brand

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Maybe Tesla drivers are more irresponsible than other car owners.

    That was going to be my suggestion.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      If there’s a systemic reason Tesla drivers have more accidents in a Tesla than drivers of other cars, that car is inherently less safe.
      You can’t simply put it down to “Tesla drivers suck”, that’s irresponsible and flawed logic.

      If it’s the acceleration, maybe we shouldn’t have cars that accelerate the way a Tesla can. But I very much doubt that is the reason except anecdotally. I suspect more that safety features may in fact serve to distract, or people “learn” to rely on them, and than they turn out to not be 100% reliable.

      We’ve all heard the weird tendency of Tesla breaking for no reason, that is hazard, also the turn signals are placed wrong, causing them to be impractical in some situations like roundabouts. Also the instrumentation in general of a Tesla is centered very much around the touch screen, another source of potential distraction. AFAIK even the speedometer isn’t placed where it should be to observe it quickly without looking away from the road for too long.

      A lot of inherent safety feature in traditional cars, have been shaved away in Tesla cars. Even getting out in an emergency can be a problem, as the handles may fail because they are electric, and the “real” handles are hidden.

      There a dozens of examples where Tesla is designed for less safety than traditional cars, and if (when) the safety features fail, I bet they are a lot less safe than if those features weren’t there to begin with.

      Tesla cars are designed with a VERY strong focus on reducing production cost, Elon Musk is even boasting about it, and how he has an uncompromising goal to simplify production. But Tesla also lack the experience about why things are like they are in traditional cars.

      • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The systemic reason might just simply be “They were the kind of a person that would buy a Tesla”.
        If I wanted to buy a safe car to drive responsibly while respecting all the traffic rules, an EV with almost a thousand horses with a 0-60 time of 2.1-2.4 seconds wouldn’t exactly be my first choice.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          If you want a more environmentally friendly car, which would you prefer: A Tesla or a Prius?
          A lot of Tesla cars were sold when there were very few to no alternatives if you wanted an EV.
          Also 2.1-2.4 is not normal for a Tesla. That’s the very fastest of them.

          • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Prius. Teslas are way too large and heavy for my tastes.
            Though preferably I’d swap my VW Up to an electric one, they were too expensive back when I got mine.

            As for the acceleration figure, I took it from this review:

            We haven’t tested a standard Tesla Model S for some time, but a 2020 model that we ran through our instrumented test regimen reached 60 mph in a blistering 2.4 seconds. You can expect roughly similar performance from the current standard Model S today. The gonzo Plaid version, which boasts a third electric motor and 1020 horsepower, reached 60 mph in just 2.1 seconds in our testing.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Tesla seems to me like a performance car that’s sold as a luxury car. I think a lot of drivers bought it when they might not be able to handle them. Anecdotally, I remember my mom spinning out at a light years ago after she bought a used luxury vehicle that was actually a powerhouse.

            That being said, your points are more then valid and user error is at most a small part of the equation.

      • olympicyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am convinced it’s the acceleration. Also because you have that ability, it influences you to take risks in traffic (eg. Pulling out of a stopped lane) that you might not take in an ICE car because you can’t hit a high scored fast enough. They opened Pandora’s box by making every family car a Porsche.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          I haven’t noticed that at all for Tesla, and I did absolutely notice with BMW and AUDI for many years. Not so much driving fast, as driving like assholes. Yes an EV often starts quicker at a read light, but I’ve never seen anything wild here that I recall, and we have a lot of Tesla and other EV cars here now (Denmark).

          But to be honest, it may be different here, because ICE cars are generally manual, which is way more fun to drive. With A Tesla you just press the speeder like an Automatic. It just responds faster. But a Tesla can also be driven for comfort, and it seems to me that’s what just about everybody does here.