• neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    MA law doesn’t force insurance providers to cover gender-affirming hair electrolysis, so most don’t. Trans women with facial hair and cis women suffering from hirsutism are all expected to live with their beards and hairy shoulders.

    Washington, Oregon, California and other states have laws on the books making it illegal for medical insurance providers to deny coverage of treatment for these conditions.

    MA doesn’t get to do victory laps for its progressive bone fides until it gets with the program and takes care of its women.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          That the states that consistently vote Republican are also consistently among the states with the worst quality of life, and that there’s a correlation between the two.

          That Republicans don’t actually care about Americans.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          That they keep voting for people who “love the working class” and who “have great economic policy” but every classically Republican state is a fucking shithole that constantly needs money from blue states to stay barely afloat.

          It’s yet more evidence that the GOP don’t have any interest and/or ability to properly run a country. All their ideas fucking suck and everything they touch is worse for it, and their base needs to realize this. Also educated or not it’s so insanely obvious these days just how bad shit is and whose at fault but us North Americans(I’m Canadian, same problems here but more boring) can’t stop but chase the right when the center falters. At this point people should be mocked, this shit’s inexcusable in ways it wasn’t as much even only 10-15 years ago.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          That red states vote against their own interests. They have massive needs and lag on many wellness metrics, yet consistently vote for politicians who are happy to keep them that way via the policy they enact

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So wait, the poor and the hopeless, looking for some kind of help, voted unanimously for TRUMP, and those happy with their current conditions and wanting no change voted for Harris.

    • Ham Strokers Ejacula@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      One state has consistently voted for democrats and one consistently votes for leopards. It isn’t really surprising that the state consistently putting leopards in power is unhappy with their current situation.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      I like how you put “trump” in all-caps bold to help us better recognize that you are on TEAM RAPIST.

      Also, the state that always votes blue is happy with their situation, and the state that always votes red is begging for change. You really can’t figure out how each state got into their respective positions?

      Perhaps the state that wants change should try voting for someone other than a Republican every single election.

    • Hux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The maps were identical in 2020 (following a republican administration):

      Oklahoma 2020

      Massachusetts 2020

      And 2008 (following a republican administration):

      Oklahoma 2008

      Massachusetts 2008

      Once you get back to pre-social media era internet, you begin to see Oklahoma have shades of blue.

      2000 1996 1992 1988

      Perhaps we could collaborate on this.

      Now that I have pulled Oklahoma’s electoral results going back to 1988, now you can pull Oklahoma’s education results going back over the same period of time and we can see if there is, in fact, a correlation between the quality of education (overall education rankings) and how the state votes in presidential elections.

      I suspect that it was not purely the quality of education which influenced the “red shift”. I would bet that the lower-quality of education made the influence of social media more effective for those targeting the less educated to adopt a conservative political position.

      Just share your findings here and we can work together.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Well done. I’ll leave my response up, but I’ll admit that the Massachusetts/Oklahoma example is a bad one to make the case that Trump was the populist in this election and Harris was a vote for the conservative “no change” position.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          27 minutes ago

          Ah yes, of course, Kamala was the more conservative option in the last election. Donald Trump is also an actual populist that cares about you. You are very smart. /s

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      maybe youre just completely unfamiliar with the word “conservative”. those red states dont want change. they want to conserve their regressive stance.

      • Yondoza@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        I think it’s pretty clear that the current Republican party is fundamentally different than the one of 15 years ago. Whether they consider themselves conservative or not, they are the party that is promising change from the status quo.

        The parties have clearly changed roles with respect to manual laborers. The blue wall doesn’t exist anymore because of this. What it all means, I have no idea, but we need to update our mental model of the two parties. Their demographic have fundamentally changed.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oklahoma has voted for Republican presidential candidates all but once since 1952 (in 1964), with the Democratic candidate having failed to pick up a single county in the state in all elections since 2004

      History. What you obviously weren’t taught.

      You must be from Oklahoma.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I see the ones under republican state leadership, clamoring for change, yet in reality voting for the same assholes that govern them into the ground? Not sure how you’re not seeing that, though I imagine it’s willful

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 hour ago

        theres a reason education goes out the windows in red states… otherwise they might understand theyre voting against their own best interests.

        its a priority to keep them stupid to stay red