• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Independents are usually not centrists but people who don’t want to admit they’re uninterested in politics. So yeah, politics is dumb and to them it also seems unnecessary, and they understand little enough to have really dumb, aggressive ideas when made to speak up.

        • derbis@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the link. However, it doesn’t seem to support the assertion that “independents are people who don’t want to admit they’re uninterested in politics.”

          Rather, it seems to support that those (Americans) who refuse to pick a side are unpredictable in their preferences.

          It even says:

          The upshot of all this is that if you’re a campaign trying to appeal to independents, moderates or undecided voters — or a concerned citizen trying to make sense of these groups in the context of an election — policy and ideology aren’t good frames of reference. There just isn’t much in terms of policy or ideology that unites these groups.

          The closest thing to your assertion in here is this opinion:

          As the political scientists Donald Kinder and Nathan Kalmoe put it, after looking at five decades of public opinion research, “the moderate category seems less an ideological destination than a refuge for the innocent and the confused.”

          NB: “the moderate category,” as distinct from independents. The article even takes pains to separate them:

          Moderate, independent and undecided voters are not the same, and none of these groups are reliably centrist. They are ideologically diverse

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, they aren’t interested enough in politics to come up with a consistent viewpoint, and they don’t admit it, but I guess that doesn’t explicitly show a motivation.

            What kind of data would convince you?

            • derbis@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean I hear you but that’s still an unsupported extrapolation. What would convince me is evidence of the claim itself.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Like what? We do not have mind reading technology yet (well, technically we do, but not like this), so motive is hard to see on an instrument readout.