MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up1604arrow-down177
arrow-up1527arrow-down1external-linkLetters to the Editor: Your 'protest vote' for Jill Stein is really a vote for Donald Trumpwww.latimes.comMicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square235fedilink
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down13·13 hours agoFor the editor and anyone else who does not understand math: people voting for Trump means Trump gets a vote. A vote for Jill Stein means Trump does not get a vote. Would you rather have someone vote third party or vote Trump?
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down3·13 hours agoThe whole thing feels like an argument intended to push people away rather than rally support.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down6·11 hours agoI’ve noticed a LOT of Lemmy’s seem to want to push people away rather than welcome or rally support when it comes to uncommitted voters or third-party voters… Very surprising to me.
minus-squareYeetPics@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoIt’s almost like we expect bad faith interactions from people trying to interact with bad faith. Weird, right?!
minus-squareTiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·edit-210 hours agoFor industryStandard and whoever else may not understand FPTP: a vote for Kamala is a vote against Trump A vote for Jill Stein is not a vote against Trump, and in fact hurts Kamala’s chances the same way a Republican voting for RFK hurts Trump’s chances Would you rather have someone vote to stop Trump or throw away their vote?
minus-squareeacapesamsara@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 hours agoThis is illogical, as it assumes someone voting for stein would vote for Harris, which isn’t the case.
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·8 hours agoJill stein is running against Trump
minus-squareTiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·8 hours agoJill Stein is literally only running to steal Kamala votes to improve the chances of Trump winning
minus-squarePeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·8 hours agothat’s not what her platform says
minus-squareYeetPics@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 hour agoBreaking news; politicians lie to you
minus-squarechakan2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·13 hours agoCorporate says spot the difference here.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·11 hours agoExactly! I’ll share your downvotes…but you’re right.
minus-squareTiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-210 hours agoFor industryStandard and whoever else may not understand FPTP: a vote for Kamala is a vote against Trump A vote for Jill Stein is not a vote against Trump, and in fact hurts Kamala Would you rather have someone vote to stop Trump or throw away their vote?
For the editor and anyone else who does not understand math: people voting for Trump means Trump gets a vote.
A vote for Jill Stein means Trump does not get a vote.
Would you rather have someone vote third party or vote Trump?
The whole thing feels like an argument intended to push people away rather than rally support.
I’ve noticed a LOT of Lemmy’s seem to want to push people away rather than welcome or rally support when it comes to uncommitted voters or third-party voters… Very surprising to me.
It’s almost like we expect bad faith interactions from people trying to interact with bad faith.
Weird, right?!
For industryStandard and whoever else may not understand FPTP: a vote for Kamala is a vote against Trump
A vote for Jill Stein is not a vote against Trump, and in fact hurts Kamala’s chances the same way a Republican voting for RFK hurts Trump’s chances
Would you rather have someone vote to stop Trump or throw away their vote?
This is illogical, as it assumes someone voting for stein would vote for Harris, which isn’t the case.
Jill stein is running against Trump
Jill Stein is literally only running to steal Kamala votes to improve the chances of Trump winning
that’s not what her platform says
Breaking news; politicians lie to you
Corporate says spot the difference here.
Exactly! I’ll share your downvotes…but you’re right.
For industryStandard and whoever else may not understand FPTP: a vote for Kamala is a vote against Trump
A vote for Jill Stein is not a vote against Trump, and in fact hurts Kamala
Would you rather have someone vote to stop Trump or throw away their vote?