• fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love that line. It’s gonna drive Trump nuts because he’ll sound like a little weasel every time he opens his mouth to trash talk Kamala and he knows it, but if he debates he’ll also look like a lying weasel 🤔

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    We are one step closer to witnessing a presidential candidate kick another presidential candidate in the balls for being a pig, during a live debate.

  • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    She should keep calling him out like it’s WrestleMania till he snaps. “What’s the matter toadstool dick? You afraid to debate this Queen? Put down the big Mac and pick up your balls old man”

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago
    CNBC Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    CNBC is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnbc/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

    • elgordino@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Credibility: High Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual

      IMO it would be better to highlight factuality over credibility in the <summary>.