Great. Let’s put him and Castro in crowns on billboards and stick them in Miami. Let them look at them for awhile.

Yes, good news. The debate narrative is done. There is 4 months of campaigning to go.

So many things to campaign on…

Immigration was bipartisan and passed by the Senate, but yes it was never brought to the floor.

You can talk now.

I doubt talking about something you can’t do could be called productive.

If it wasn’t clearly obvious that votes matter before, you’re not paying attention.

Sorry, but she can’t try. The floor is controlled by Republicans and they will not let her proceed.

Well congresswoman, there still is a republican majority so you’re going to have to wait for your chance. In addition, balance of powers and all that.

Here’s your bumper sticker…

No Kings, Vote Biden

I do get it and I would welcome such a decision. I just don’t believe it’s forthcoming

Countries with impoverished populations are likely to invest money on education. USAiD can help them do that.

So, you’re really not talking about permanent immigration, you’re talking about training. Good.

All true, but who is going to force change in those countries? Of course nurses are needed in the US, but are they not needed in those countries too? And when they are needed and not there, will we send some?

The statement that most people that apply for immigration are the more active and engaged in their own countries. So, if you find that to be true, it may also be true that it’s in everyone’s best interest if they remain in their countries to change them. The idea is that the US should encourage this.

Historians will look back and identify this ruling as a key moment in America’s relentless march to a dictatorship.

All to support an absolute moron.

Sounds like Richard Nixon would have had very little to worry about had this Court been around fifty years ago.

Which brings us to Trump…

A couple of years ago, I read that California needed to open a school a day to keep up with a growing population due to immigration. If you’re a California taxpayer, you’re paying it. Rejoicing is up to you.

You’re taking an issue mentioned in passing as the total embodiment. I’m sure that you think you won something.

It would be more beneficial for them to change where they are at. We have a way to do this through foreign aid. For instance, a medical doctor can immigrate to the US, but their home country needs doctors too. Yet, we wait until there is desperate need and then step in.

There are economic implications of absorbing greater populations. Why wouldyouthink there are not? Schools, hospitals, roads, etc. all must be increased. And as the vid points out, you still don’t have an effect on world poverty by doubling immigration