Joe Biden will not be the Democratic nominee in Novemberā€™s presidential election, thankfully. He is not withdrawing because heā€™s being held responsible for enabling war crimes against the Palestinian people (though a recent poll does have nearly 40 percent of Americans saying theyā€™re less likely to vote for him thanks to his handling of the war). Yet itā€™s impossible to extricate the collapse in public faith in the Biden campaign from the ā€œuncommittedā€ movement for Gaza. They were the first people to refuse him their votes, and defections from within the presidentā€™s base hollowed out his support well in advance of the debate.

The Democrats and their presumptive nominee Kamala Harris are faced with a choice: On the one hand, they can continue Bidenā€™s monstrous support for Netanyahu, the brutal IDF, and Israelā€™s genocide of Palestinians. That would help allow the party to cover for Biden and put a positive spin on a smooth handoff, even though we all know this would mainly benefit the embittered president himself and his small coterie of loyalists. Such a choice would confirm that the institutional rot that allowed the current situation to develop still characterizes the party.

  • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I mean, yea. You think the world is some happy go lucky place where people donā€™t fight each other?

    Ummā€¦lol no. I think the world is run by military forces and their obedient governments.

    The US dropped two nuclear bombs on civilians in Japan to end a war quickly

    Vaporize civilians for peace!

    theyā€™d kill civilians again in a heartbeat if it was beneficial to America

    If by America you mean imperial warmaking and profits then yes, ā€œtheyā€ have, would, and will continue.

    The number of civilians that died from the American invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan after 9/11 shows that very clearly. The current Palestinian death toll is less than 10% of that 20 year conflict, and it was done by Americans directly

    This point is really confusing butā€¦yay America?

    Cuba is being used as a pawn by other countries to threaten the US

    Wow what a take. Other countries support Cuba, so the USA gets to perpetuate invasions, assassination attempts, terrorism and eternal economic warfare. The Cubans have no autonomy but also they brought this on themselves.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          2 months ago

          Oddly enough, there wasnā€™t after the bombing of Pearl harbor.

          Tit for tat. Sorry our tat was bigger.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I donā€™t recall ever saying that.

              I apologized our boom was bigger. It was genuine. Should never have happened.

              I would, however, argue that a blow designed to end combat is more ethical than one intended to wound and mame.