• GroundedGator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 days ago

    So the under 18 mother who was forced to carry a child can’t take that child to a library or even go herself.

    Yep, that tracks.

  • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    typical america moment

    you get ID’d at the library.

    Books? We must protect the children!

    Guns? Oh, no take the children before my guns!

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      8 days ago

      The fact that the stupidity is intentional and the desired result is the rub. Stupid, uneducated people are less likely to think critically and more likely to accept and support whatever bullshit the political party behind all this shit Republicans spew out.

    • Starrifier@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      These lunatics are working on making prison time the punishment for that, so good luck.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      as a former public librarian, i can tell you there are absolutely boomer losers with nothing to do who will sit there and make sure someone’s enforcing it. so fucking glad i work at an academic library now and no one can say shit when i put the gayest books in existence on display

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d be surprised if any do. I haven’t heard of a single librarian that’s been in favor of these shenanigans anywhere.

  • Twinkletoes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah. Keep them kids out of the library. They should be at home on the internet where they will only be exposed to wholesome content.

  • bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    This post is pretty out of context. https://idahocapitalsun.com/2024/04/10/idaho-libraries-must-move-materials-deemed-harmful-to-children-or-face-lawsuits-under-new-law/

    Some libraries are doing things like this as a form of protest. The law doesn’t require such a stringent process as this, but that’s irrelevant. What’s relevant is the law is infringing on freedom of speech by regulating libraries’ content.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t see how the law doesn’t require libraries to go 18+ to be free of liability.

      The language in this law is extremely broad. If anyone finds anything that they find objectionable in the children’s section, they can sue the librarians.

      There’s literally no way to protect yourself against this but to bar all children from the library, unless they have parental supervision. This ensures that the parent remains liable since they have become an obligated chaperone while inside the library.

      There’s no way to actually remove all the “offensive” content from the children’s section, because there’s no way to actually know what books that the extremists this law was created to enable will object to next.

      That it has the added effect of humiliating the Republicans who passed it by showing what it logically leads to, and angering parents who can no longer drop their kids off at the library, may be helpful in opposing this, but it looks like it’s just the predictable result of short-sighted reactionary lawmaking.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sure the very people who put out these laws are going to be extremely bothered by libraries preventing kids from accessing cheap culture and education

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        True enough, but I think their aim is at citizens moreso than politicians. I would wager a lot of average folks probably weren’t even aware of the law being passed, stuff like this brings it more attention. Is it effective? No idea, I don’t live in Idaho. I wouldn’t be surprised it isn’t that effective, given how conservative most of Idaho is. But, I can respect libraries from at least trying to do something about it.

        • redisdead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t think the people who vote for this actually care. They’ve been told that every other book in them libruhries have them gay sex things, and that’s enough for them to cheer for it.

  • El_guapazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 days ago

    I posted this on my FB feed. One lady argued that it was down to parental rights to control what their kids consumed. I said just stay out of the public library and public schools, but she said that was not a “good faith” argument.

    The irony is using “good faith” to impose their beliefs onto others was lost on her.

  • LostWanderer@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    Voting Blue is the way; Kicking those MAGA Fascists and their Church Bullies out of politics will help lessen their power. I never want to see a sign like this in my own public library! Attacking access to knowledge is a bold move, if it succeeds, I will be deeply saddened (it has a high chance in my area due to the brainwashed MAGA Fascists).