Who is surprised?

  • 312@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not forced on you. If you don’t download Threads and log in, you’re not on threads.

    This is akin to saying Google Calendar is “forced” on you if you have a Gmail account. They are separate services that use a common credential, you are under no obligation to use any or all of those services.

    • 0x815@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not forced on you. If you don’t download Threads and log in, you’re not on threads.

      Although that’s technically true, it is clear what Meta is doing here (and even if most may know that the company sucks, I personally feel it is important report on things like that). Meta’s tactics should create a hype making people believe there are substantially more users than there actually are. The mass of people won’t recognize (or even care?) what’s going on I’m afraid.

      • 312@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is Meta doing here? I’m not clear on what the point being made is.

        If you’re insinuating that they are doing this to artificially inflate user counts, why wouldn’t they be reporting about how there are 2+ billion threads users in the first week?

        They don’t need to manufacture hype - like Meta or not, in the first 96 hours they brought in almost 100 million users. Thats a third of Twitter’s entire active user base, in less than a week.

        • 0x815@feddit.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems we agree to disagree. The point I make is pretty clear, and it doesn’t make sense if you repeating your arvuments over and over again.