• dawt@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have found that practical solutions are rarely all or nothing, personally.

    Are you against eating meat from a consequentialist perspective, or a deontological one? In my opinion, less meat eaten is better - better for the environment, and less money going into cruel practices around slaughtering animals, etc - even if the reasons for it are varied and not strictly from a standard of moral duty.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone is a consequentialist these days it seems. Assume consequentialism until proven otherwise