President Biden on Monday ripped the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor for seeking arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. āThe ICC pā¦
doubling down on the stance of not understanding linguistics isnāt the play you seem to think it is
the wikipedia article on zionism is several thousand words long, and you seem to think itās possible to accurately boil that down to a one or two sentence dictionary entry
Iām sure Republicans have many definitions for a liberal.
itās more that they donāt have a definition at all
they use it similarly to āwokeā, in that its a nebulous word that takes on any given meaning that they want given the context
if you tried to distill its myriad of uses into an actual definition youād get something like āperson i disagree with to the point of dislikeā, at which point the dumb part becomes making an assertion as utterly vacuous as āi donāt like people i donāt likeā
Iām boiling it down because this isnāt the kind of platform to express a thousand words. I use the dictionary, as you should. You seem to make a word which it is not. That may work in your world and it may work in the Republican world, but that doesnāt mean people with a common language have to accept it. Both you and Republicans are trying demean others using language which is not applicable.
youāre not avoiding excessive detail in a definition due to a limited character space, youāre saying that a word can literally only ever have the precise meaning ascribed to it by the dictionary
those are two completely different things and itās astonishing that you would even try to make an argument that bad after opening this discussion with āiām sure you can do better than thatā
iām not trying to justify my use of language, iām explaining why youāre wrong, and youāre responding by gesturing vaguely towards the concept of a dictionary
doubling down on the stance of not understanding linguistics isnāt the play you seem to think it is
the wikipedia article on zionism is several thousand words long, and you seem to think itās possible to accurately boil that down to a one or two sentence dictionary entry
itās more that they donāt have a definition at all
they use it similarly to āwokeā, in that its a nebulous word that takes on any given meaning that they want given the context
if you tried to distill its myriad of uses into an actual definition youād get something like āperson i disagree with to the point of dislikeā, at which point the dumb part becomes making an assertion as utterly vacuous as āi donāt like people i donāt likeā
itās completely dissimilar
Iām boiling it down because this isnāt the kind of platform to express a thousand words. I use the dictionary, as you should. You seem to make a word which it is not. That may work in your world and it may work in the Republican world, but that doesnāt mean people with a common language have to accept it. Both you and Republicans are trying demean others using language which is not applicable.
youāre not avoiding excessive detail in a definition due to a limited character space, youāre saying that a word can literally only ever have the precise meaning ascribed to it by the dictionary
those are two completely different things and itās astonishing that you would even try to make an argument that bad after opening this discussion with āiām sure you can do better than thatā
Still trying to justify your use of languageā¦you need to be able to spit Zionist. That really says something about you.
iām not trying to justify my use of language, iām explaining why youāre wrong, and youāre responding by gesturing vaguely towards the concept of a dictionary
Vauguely? Youāve already Googled it and you know itās true. Itās really telling that you keep on this for days.
the first result is the wikipedia article, which as weāve discussed, is several thousand words long
Ridiculous. Enjoy your life and your hate.
lmfao