While Jitsi is open-source, most people use the platform they provide, meet.jit.si, for immediate conference calls. They have now introduced a “Know Your Customer” policy and require at least one of the attendees to log in with a Facebook, Github (Microsoft), or Google account.

One option to avoid this is to self-host, but then you’ll be identifiable via your domain and have to maintain a server.

As a true alternative to Jitsi, there’s jami.net. It is a decentralized conference app, free open-source, and account creation is optional. It’s available for all major platforms (Mac, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android), including on F-Droid.

  • gelberhut@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    “If someone was using Jitsi, it was specifically to not use a login with any of those providers” this sounds like the only reason to use jitsi is avoid big guys, and if you cannot avoid them jitsi makes no sense - i.e. “no big guys” is the only feature worth it.

    Btw, “login via Google” and use “Google meet” are significantly different cases from privacy point of view.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the only reason to use jitsi, just that most people wouldn’t bother seeking any alternative if they didn’t care.

    • The Cuuuuube@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Main motivating factor” != “Only viable reason”

      Sorry for any unclarity I introduced. And yes, login via google vs full on google meet are two different things, but if I have to login via google for Jitsi I’m suddenly far more likely to use Jami