• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    you, uh, sure about that?

    Trump signed the deal in feb of '20, and started the process rolling. Trump took it from 13k troops to 2.5k by the time Biden took office. Biden continued along the nominal plan largely because you can’t just stop massive troop movements like that.

    as for it being a shit show; we left behind ~350k rifles, there were helicopters (littlebirds, blackhawks,) drones (boeing scan eagles); over 50 AFVs- mostly M1117’s; 60 mortars and artilery pieces;

    Over a hundred civilians died during the withdrawal, and thousands of civillians who worked with the US (on the promise of being protected, no less,) were left behind on the tarmac.

    You’re right. It wasn’t a shit show. that’s far too generous. It was a giant, shitty clusterfuck.

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Biden continued along the nominal plan largely because you can’t just stop massive troop movements like that.”

      Yes you can. He had every opportunity to stop and reverse the withdrawal.

      And that’s your shit show? That’s the cleanest withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2000 years. With the Afghan gov. collapsing within days, how clean do you think it possibly could have been?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        He’d have to have sent troops back when he got into office. We weren’t getting the interpreters out without controlling the ground ourselves.

        That was politically and logistically unfeasible.

        • dudinax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Look at the time span from Biden entering office and the withdrawal, then look at the time span from September 11, 2001 to the invasion of Afghanistan. Reversing the withdrawal months in advance was logistically well within the capabilities of the US military and would have been politically less risky since withdrawals are extremely hard to execute as well as the US military executed this one.

          edit: Massive changes/reversals in military objectives are implausible on the scale of hours or even days, but making sudden changes, moving masses of men and material in a new direction to do a new thing on short notice is one of the abilities of a good military. The notion that the US military, a very good military, couldn’t reverse itself when given months to do so isn’t well thought out.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And what were we going to tell Pakistan? You realize the bulk of our supplies came by land through there?

            What would the Afghan reaction be? Because at that point you lose credibility. They see it as a second invasion.

            And yeah, what do you tell the American people who are severely war weary?

            It was never about the military’s internal ability. It was about the actual logistics chain and appearing to go back on a major deal in a county where that means people definitely start helping the terrorists because they lose faith in you ever leaving voluntarily.