the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]

Sooner or later they’d get me for one thing if not for another…

[But if] a fellow ain’t got a soul of his own, just little piece of a big soul, the one big soul that belongs to everybody, then…Then it don’t matter. I’ll be all around in the dark – I’ll be everywhere.

  • 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 5th, 2023

help-circle




  • He had no resistance, he had no plan, he had no ideology, or grand vision.

    I think the small difference in our opinions is perhaps our different meanings ascribed to the word “resistance”, which does not (in my mind) have anything to do with a vision or an ideology. It can of course but a simpler, baser resistance is what he did, and what i mean.

    Why couldn’t Lawrence just become the killer the US military wanted him to be? Perhaps he himself didn’t know, but in the end instead of moved by the inexorable power to change in to something he was not, he resisted this change. He could not be moved, could not be moulded into what they wanted him to be, “went crazy”.

    It wasn’t a choice, youre right. He couldn’t become it. And unfortunately (j/k fortunately. a speech would be dumb) he didn’t have the screen time to write a speech on why he did what he did. We’re left to guess why he made this decision. Now if we all had an assignment to write a paper on leonard’s motivations but weren’t allowed to use the word “crazy” or anything about his intelligence, what would one say was going through his mind?

    Great movies that don’t tell the audience everything also invite the audience to make these connections themselves. There’s no right answer either of us will walk away with here but it’s a fun exercise and a good one; one shouldn’t just dismiss these ideas because they are not spelled out explicitly


  • Any act of resistance was by complete accident. He was just pushed over the edge.

    Are those two things any different, really? Some people, maybe most people, respond to unrelenting pressure by giving in. Hell maybe Pyle was mostly like this for the most part. Maybe most of us also have one thing we can’t abide, one thing where we’d break before we aquiesced. Isn’t that what resistance is?









  • I think it’s that, and also that these publications are written for the exact people their language is targeting.

    Good point… That must be why i read these things and greet this weird feeling they I’ve heard this language, verbatim. I see myself holding a stale donut at every mgmt meeting I’ve ever been forced to attend. They’re not really talking to you. They’re just talking points. Points you then see repeated in media ad nauseam.

    It’s not only demeaning because it’s so obviously bullshit, it’s, it’s… also paternal or something.

    But maybe this is like you say, that it is even worse, they they’re not really talking to us at all.

    it normalizes the kind of dialogues they’re having behind closed doors and helps shape the direction of that dialogue as well.

    If the media aren’t even talking to us, but the caps, could that fact be why online libs are so consistently arrogant and dismissive?

    Believing a lie like OPs piece means adopting the language too, and the imagined position of power that comes with it. It sounds just like how their bosses talk.

    Threatening that lie also threatens their imagined position of power. Their arrogance is mental protection from the chains that bind em.

    Sorry I ramble a bit, your comment was insightful and got me thinking.