Almost as if it’s artificial.
Almost as if it’s artificial.
Sure, but people seem to buy into that very buzz wordyness and ignore the usefulness of the technology as a whole because “ai bad.”
Surely. But if your purpose it to affect the ultimate outcome with the electoral college in mind, then this is not a good choice. It’s not exactly a swing state. Far from it.
I mean, absentee votes in Montana are not a very good target if it was intentional.
Only to be eaten like apples.
I’ll scratch it or lose it, and if I don’t, I’ll have a pile of plastic crap I don’t want. I’m not really worried about digital media being taken away, and I could find it again if need be.
I mean, I don’t want to either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Gerrymandering affects the house. It’s the electoral college that affects the presidential election.
Could have sub for popular_opinion and automatically cross-post submissions that are under 50% to unpopular_opinion.
Then you could see how popular an unpopular opinion is.
Seriously, their bias is right in the name.
They are not fully in control because the ruling didn’t say that affirmative action couldn’t be a government requirement. It said that a policy that enables affirmative action violates the constitution.
So, they are no longer asking applicants about race or ethnicity information. But they are expanding recruitment and financial aid to prioritize low income students.
I’m not agreeing with the court ruling, just clarifying the false representation of the issue with regard to the school.
They do this all the time, it’s really gross, take it as a badge of honor.
A cunning linguist once said
Jokes on them, they didn’t know we were already immune to pompous xenophobes by living here.
This guy takes care of himself …better keep an eye on 'em.
But that doesn’t make sugar bad. It makes too much sugar bad, which seems to be what they were saying. Albeit, ineloquently. **Insert thought terminating insult.
That, and people with coverage are afraid to lose it for something seemingly unknown. The devil you know kind of thing. Not saying that’s a reason to keep it, but it’s one reason why it’s “popular.”
Not really. It’s still an amount of weight even if it’s described differently.
It’s not like this mf couldn’t lift metric weights. Although, that would be very funny. Like kryptonite or some shit.
There’s some sampling bias at play because you don’t hear about the less flashy examples. I use machine learning for particle physics, but there’s no marketing nor outrage about it.