I think it helps to give people the benefit of the doubt instead of jumping to accusations of hypocrisy. And if it really keeps happening, you know you won’t fit with that group anyways so best to move on.

This way you deal with the actions you don’t like people doing in a way that doesn’t cause a negative mindset.

Although I will admit, its not like its the easiest thing to just find a new friend group in general so it could get tiring for sure.

The reason they got upset is because they changed the topic immediately instead of considering the point their friend was making.

People get frustrated with people buried in politics because every single conversation turns into politics. Their friend wanted to talk about nice holiday nonsense, and instead its a conversation about politics.

Seems that way when they suggest something that would help trump win.

These people dont want Biden to earn the uncommitted voters, they just want him to win THEIR vote.

American selfishness comes out in many different ways.

Yeah its safer to not make any guesses I suppose. We would have to get that information either from the supposed victim or the abuser though, and there would be questions about how trustworthy that is.

I guess if we had like surveillance and communications that showed behavior like that.

So where would you put the limit? If I had to guess your position, you think age limits to be arbitrary and useless?

Okay so you are responsible for the next dead cow that the company has to produce now to replace the one you bought.

Your action led to a dead cow in the future.

Does that work?

I’m being told I’m not allowed to continue this conversation by someone’s mod team, so I guess have a good day sir.

People replying to you aren’t being petty, you carry yourself in a very aggressive way and I don’t think you realize it.

You made up a narrative without any evidence to back it up, people corrected you with references, but you ignore them because you’ve blocked any view that causes your blood pressure to rise.

People are responding to you like this because you present yourself absurdly and then defend it absurdly.

One of the few posters I honestly think is a troll, I’m just not sure if you realize it or not.

The video shows a “black church” filled with white people. So they either went to a mixed church (that leans white) and called it a black church, or they went to a black church and the majority of people who wanted to go hear him speak were white anyways.

So hes either a liar trying to make it look like black people like him, or black people find him so offensive they wouldnt even go to their own church to hear him speak, allowing the space to be filled with white people.

I suppose there is the possibility black people were prevented from going, and white people were purposefully placed into the crowds but im not sure who would gain from that.

There is not a consensus that people are leaving the democratic party.

Also, polls only give you statistics about folk who will actually take a poll or reply to a pollster.

Im not sure if you realized the source you posted has a disclaimer: “[APP NOTE: Like all “Campaign Press Releases” this document was entirely the product of a partisan political campaign. It is archived at the APP as part of the record of campaign communications. The APP has not assessed the accuracy of any claims made here either pro or con.]”

Since this release came from Trump, it shouldn’t be used to add validity to Trumps claims about helping African Americans, right?

Why wouldn’t you compare like situations? It appears you chose a rather well set-up charging station vs. a poorly setup swapping station.

I didn’t picture an oil change when I imagined a battery swap station, I am not sure that should be the default or starting point.

My guess is gun advocates think its a restriction on the 2nd amendment?

So your argument is that you can’t possibly imagine a bad consequence of social media, that the studies by scientists showing the negative aspects are “pseudoscience”, that they don’t actually care about children, and that these politicians are just pushing this message to make a profit.

Did I get it right?

What will you lose if children are warned about the dangers of social media anyways?