you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same
you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same
actually that’s written with stone
well yeah, there’s only so much sexy to go around. how else do you propose we save some for spiders?
sorry, I’m a little slow today. how is this seemingly keeping the economy afloat?
don’t forget ablutophobia
that’s why he said: light years away
as in: there is still a great amount of distance Orban thinks Ukraine needs to cover before they converge with the EU admissions acceptability criteria
God, I can’t believe I just had to defend Orban
every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )
I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?
some injustices are structural
3rd panel, second shelf from the bottom
actually history is just our collective understanding of the past, so if it changes, history changes
Right, and this Walmart in Europe would be where exactly?
that’s just a fancy way of saying:
imagine you have two children and live in a system of gavelkind succession. now consider the share of one of the children. then forget the children and make that share the new bank balance
I think the worry is a WW3 with China
I’m sure you do :)
That being said, by choosing not to break gender norms, are you not helping reinforce what an idea of female is?
(OK, maybe I’m going round in circles here)
Anyway, you have a lovely day :)
but isn’t the difference in one case free gender expression, whereas the other is (e.g. for trans male to female): I think I’m a woman and to show this I’m going to specifically dress in the ‘stereotypically womanliest’ way possible?
or, more generally, people shouldn’t be using gender as the reason to dress and act the way they want to. else they’re affirming that a certain gender means a certain form of acting.
obviously this is an exaggeration. but since we’re playing the game.
ok, I’ll bite and role-play devil’s advocate. how do you respond to such a take?
well if the feminist movement is all about deconstructing gender and removing fixed ideas of gender, then surely the trans movement is reversing this by reinforcing stereotypes in how people dress etc. /s
right, except sometimes it’s easier to impose conditions on certain countries than others. for example the US was able to get the previous Indian administration to sign a treaty ceding partial control of their arsenal to them, on threat of sanctions (if I recall correctly). as much as the US might want to do something like that with China, it wouldn’t be anywhere near as easy to pull off.
this is just an example, I’m not attaching moral value to what occurred/occurs
I’m pretty sure he was involved with the liberation theology movements in Argentina before the previous pope clamped down on it (in his capacity as a cardinal)