Slav squat?

I thought the “oh I missed it” was about him missing the earlier kill-screen trigger on level 155, before triggering it on 157.

This was what I followed to set things up:

https://www.crosstalksolutions.com/cloudflare-tunnel-easy-setup/

The only difference is that I bought my domain from cloudflare too, so I didn’t need to do the first few steps.

I installed the cloudflared docker container and set up the Cloudflare Zero Access Tunnel thing.

I can’t stream my plex media through it due to TOS, but with access control and the 1.1.1.1 DNS and everything, it has been great.

I’m new to this entire field, and only recently set up my NAS with DDNS and everything to get around my CGNAT. I decided to go with Cloudflare since it was a name I knew well, and reviews were good. It did feel a bit overwhelming at first, but it was pretty easy to figure out what I needed to do and what I didn’t, and I am pretty happy with it.

It is possible to set up pihole on the free tier of Google cloud and stay connected to it at all times through a VPN. I have been using that for a few years now with minimal issues. Here’s a tutorial on how to do it.

Got it, thanks!

Please correct me if I am misunderstanding something here, then: Doesn’t the ruling here state that the human using the AI tried to apply for a copyright listing himself as the copyright holder and the AI as the author that worked on a commission for him, which is what was denied? Or are you saying that the reason it was denied is because he listed the AI as the author?

Just thinking out loud: how would this impact AI-generated videos, or stuff like AI-generated actors and AI-written scripts? Does this suggest that stuff made by AI would, by default, belong to the public domain? If true, that could do quite a bit in forcing the movie studios to get off their asses and bring them back to the negotiating table with the actors and writers.

I’m not disagreeing with you, but looking at it from another perspective: the customer is always right in the sense that for a business to survive, it needs to have customers to buy their stuff and generate revenue. Yes, they will also keep cutting costs to increase profit, but not at the cost of knowingly dropping revenues.

The bigger less efficient vehicles and bigger less affordable houses just mean that we are not their target customers.

For houses, Blackstone and the other big companies buying them at any price are what the customers builders and landowners want. What their end goal is? I don’t have a clue.

As for cars, bigger less efficient ones are usually bought by less conscious customers, who don’t care as much about practicality and cost of ownership. For car companies, it is cheaper and easier to build a worse car, let it market itself, and sell it at a high margin than it is to develop something better and educate careful customers into why they are better. As such, many just simply choose to target the former. That group is their customer, and they are always right. If that segment shrinks or changes, the company’s policy will too.