Energy drinks are counter intuitive.

The first thing to understand is there is no such thing as a “sugar rush” in the sense of gaining a burst of energy. The crash though, is very real.

Your body has not evolved to process that much sugar, so it tries to store it, which itself is energy intensive, so consuming large amounts of sugar will make you lethargic.

If you need the burst of energy in the morning, drink black coffee. You’ll learn to love it as your palette develops.

Because.

What do you mean “in her new Netflix special”?

I was there. /v/ was ripping on Fuckley in the weeks leading to Loss. Every comic was dissected to find the joke, and then remixed to be funny (because CAD wasn’t).

And then Loss dropped, and /v/ went ape shit.

I miss old /v/ :(

Get a load of this guy, peeling their apples, grapes and tomatoes.

I do the same with rats

The problem is that the “thing” is either:

• never have I ever done this <thing> or
• <never have I ever done this thing>

That’s what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

Never have I ever heard “I’m proud of you” from my Dad :'(

Mitty…

It’s regrettable that it became part of “psychology 101” (in a general sense).

Can you imagine how much misinformation is piggybacking off these “facts” about human nature?

4. The Bro(nx)

Sounds very penis’y

I’m no George Bush fan, but in his defence:

Point 1: the implication is the US are thinking about how the enemy will harm them

Point 2: he is convinced the purpose of war is to establish peace

Point 3: he probably meant "to catapult over the propaganda

Point 4: ya dun fukt up

Point 5: ya dun fukt up 2 George Bush Junioroo

Point 6: (yes, i know it’s hypocritical) he’s right tho lol

Point 7: heh heh

New meta: be as specific as possible so that others think you’re being ironic.

Lol

I mean, I’m happy with where it ended TBH

I think that makes you amnesic

Gnostic / Agnostic is simply a claim about knowledge.

I’m agnostic as to whether my bread is stale. (I don’t know if my bread is stale).

I’m gnostic about the planets shape (I know it’s a dodecahedron).

Theist / Atheist is a claim about belief.

Every person fits into one of the following:

• A Gnostic Theist claims to know God exists (therefore implicitly believing)

• A Gnostic Atheist claims to know God doesn’t exist.

• An Agnostic Theist believes in God but doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make definitive claims.

• An Agnostic Atheist doesn’t have sufficient evidence to make claims about God, and therefore doesn’t believe.

In terms of rationale, both Gnostic groups make definitive claims without sufficient evidence and should not be trusted.

The Gnostic Theists believe in something without evidence, this is a fallacy, but it’s something we all do every day. For example, I don’t know if it will rain, but I believe it might, so I bring an umbrella.

An Agnostic Atheist is the most rational. If you don’t have sufficient evidence to make a definitive claim, then why would you believe it?

Moral of the story: don’t skip the tutorial.

deleted by creator