In other news, recent study reveals ground wet when raining
And saying “See, gurney? We’ve her best interest at heart”.
Start volunteering for the person running against them!
Call your house representatives, have them legislate on and forbid this practice, be explicit about not voting for them if they don’t make it part of their platform.
https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative
You could almost say… They’re weird!
Shit, am I OOTL? i like NDGT, but should i not? Did he do something shitty?
Well it makes sense if you think of it as a guide of "places worth driving to "
Let’s be clear on what that implies: it means all women travelling Interstate would have to prove at a state border that they’re not pregnant. Which means proving with what?
Some form of proof you have an IUD or contraceptive? They’re planning on banning that too.
Some kind of medical document, emitted less than x days ago by a doctor?
And since that would be insanely difficult to obtain, it essentially means women would be banned from interstate travel.
Welcome to Gilead, blessed be the fucking fruit.
I don’t pick his side. #BelieveCouches
Good luck with that.
Literally a few articles above in my feed:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/25/kamala-harris-trump-republicans-attacks
Interesting! Didn’t know Nikki Haley herself could pledge her loyalty to the loofah-faced shit-gibbon, but her PAC could decide to do a hard pivot. Can they rename the PAC?
If she had held strong against Trump, would have been interesting to imagine a Harris-Haley ticket. Probably a million wrong things about it, don’t get me wrong - but in terms of a unifying ticket… Lol
No need to tell me how stupid this is, i know!!
It was never about him being shot though, it was about mental health, right? 😏
Can you imagine 🤯
I would have preferred if her first statement was about stomping out fascism and restoring and cementing abortion rights, rather than “winning and earning the nomination”…
That said: big q for me is who she’ll pick as vp!
Why not make an Olympic bid be for 20 years, 5 games? With summer and winter bids offset, so for instance you’d have Paris be the summer games city 2024-2044 and Vancouver 2030-2050, something like that… Would give plenty of time to monetize the infrastructure investment, but not so long as massive repairs are needed…
While we’re at it, all projects should include plans and funding to convert Olympic facilities into good quality low cost housing after the 20y are up, why not…
🤷♂️
In a panicked attempt to stop Bernie, if you recall
Extraction per se, maaaaybe.
Burning of the extracted fuel? Never.
Hon hon hon!