It’s extra funny considering the pace in Hot Fuzz is super snappy. And Hot Fuzz is definitely their masterpiece.

Posts are not being marked as read, unless the comments are opened.

I learnt that over a decade ago.

Don’t buy a Ubisoft, EA, or frankly any big publisher game.

Absolute fucking hero.

Or it’s because Western countries directly prop up and support Israel, which we do not do for China or Russia.

And therefore Western citizenry feel more culpable and outraged about something their countries support.

Mmmmmmm, brown noise <3

Me and my wife… Got really bored. The gameplay loop is supppperr trivial, and even though they add in stuff every now and again, eh…

I dunno, it’s okay - but I just don’t get the hype. I wanted to pitch in because if someone is considering buying it I’d really recommend checking a Let’s Play of it before trying it.

It felt like a game specifically designed for a gamer to introduce gaming to their never-gamed-before partner. If you’re both experienced gamers like we are, I wonder whether you’d give up on it too.

TIL thanks.

What’s the difference?

Cleaner/clearer joke delivery would be:

Counting crows is just murder by numbers.

In my non-comedically talented opinion, of course.

Sir, this is a shitpost.

Oh no!

Anyway…

Corbyn was absolutely shit smeared by the press; if you get people to look at Corbyn’s Labour policies in isolation, I reckon you’d be hard pressed to find someone that disliked them.

I wonder why privately held media would do this…

Was he not very popular in his constituency though?

Was disappointing to see so much pussyfooting and backpedalling on stuff like this from Labour over the past 18 months.

I’ll be over the damned moon if they put some strong climate positive policies in the manifesto.

Is it too much to hope for electoral reform too?

Pugilistic - TIL a new word!

No worries. What I’d give to shoot the person that came up with the FPTP voting system…

I feel like you took my comment to be a critique of the EU’s position, which is not what I was trying to say at all.

I presume that such an agreement would be in the EUs interest - hence the expression of such. Public clarification at this stage of the ‘cost’- as you put it - is a great way to take it off the official policy booklet. Which doesn’t make sense to me.

I am aware that UK politics is stupid. I live here.

If the move would be of interest to the EU, then unless they are completely politically inept, can these officials not see how saying it would require ECJ oversight before an election risks it being eliminated from Labour policy?

It gives a free attack point for the Tories and couldn’t be a bigger face palm - for anyone actually interested in it, of course.

Anyone that expected the current British government to do anything a government is meant to do… Well… Let me introduce you to the past 14 years of disappointment.

The trouble is the upfront capital though, but at the same time another publisher would surely bite at the thought of getting a talented studio’s staff in one go?