• 1 Post
  • 1.1K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 3rd, 2024

help-circle
  • I think I get what you are intending to imply by the word “intuitively”; it’s that it eventually becomes as reflexive and fluid as touch-typing itself.

    Exactly like that!

    It’s also another source of the many “I can’t exit Vim” jokes, because it is now genuinely disorienting for me to try to edit text without Vim key bindings.

    Gosh you make it sound almost like you play Vim like an instrument more than use it…!

    That’s a great analogy. It does very much feel that way.

    Honestly that sounds cool _

    It is pretty cool.

    Wether it’s really worth the learning curve is probably unique to each person that tries it. But for folks who need to edit a lot of text a lot of the time, it’s pretty great.




  • Doesn’t matter we will tell you either way.

    • Instead of simply shortcuts, vim uses “chords”. Every new shortcut I learn can be combined intuitively* with all the other shortcuts I know.
    • Because of this there’s no faster way to edit files than Vim in the hands of an experienced user.
    • this let’s me spend almost no time editing code, freeing up the rest of my time for swearing at piss poor documentation.

    * I use “intuitively” here in a way that not merely stretches, but outright abuses the definition of the word.













  • MajorHavoc@programming.devtoLinux@lemmy.mlThe Dislike to Ubuntu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ubuntu was a big part of my path to full time Linux use. I adore everyone who has contributed to Ubuntu.

    But also, Snaps are bullshit, and are why I replaced all my Ubuntu installs with Debian.

    Canonical doesn’t get to pretend to be surprised by the backlash for pushing an unnecessary closed proprietary platform on their freedom seeking users.

    I still adore everyone at Canonical and in the Ubuntu community, for all they’ve done for the Linux community. Y’all still rock. Thanks!


  • Real world experience can help, but what we have now is also too stupid to recognize when it’s succeeding or failing. It just greedily gobbles up inputs and feedback indiscriminately.

    There’s currently no way to know if the necessary advancement, to advance independently of humans, is 2 years and 2000 years away.

    Even so, nature tells us that advancement probably isn’t coming at all. It’s not needed, so long as there are billions of humans available to partner with.