During the last year of that, Obama was denied the ability to nominate a Supreme Court Justice on an Election Year. Then, Trump got 2 nominees appointed to the SCOTUS, one of which was on an election year.
During the last year of that, Obama was denied the ability to nominate a Supreme Court Justice on an Election Year. Then, Trump got 2 nominees appointed to the SCOTUS, one of which was on an election year.
Last match our scout died to medic 5 times, there is no salvaging this.
A brilliant kind of stupidity, though. They know this won’t hold up, they’re just trying to buy time so Trump doesn’t spend part of his campaign behind bars.
Seems fair to me, tbh. I wouldn’t go there without diplomatic immunity or a burner anyways.
Yes. To clarify for you:
One story is he does regular legislative actions, the states can contest it
another story is he does something criminal as official business, nobody can do shit about it
How to be successful long term:
Make a good game
Don’t ship your game with a rootkit
Don’t ban entire regions from your game
Immune from criminal prosecution*
The state AGs can and will still challenge any and all such executive orders.
But if Biden hypothetically were to kidnap, beat, or murder supreme court justices or political opponents, then that’s another story.
Well, Congressional Impeachment of the justices are responsible for a traditional firing, but if it’s an official action then Biden can order to have them kidnapped, beaten, or even killed.
You can remove court justices via impeachment. They’re not impeaching the president, they’re impeaching the Supreme Court justices. They’re nominated by presidents and confirmed by congress, so it falls on congress to remove them.
“Prepare to travel by warp.”
“Captain, that will set us back days!”
Some users on here use Capitalism as an opposite term to Communism.
Holy Shit I know that crow.
Somewhere around the house I have an inked drawing with the same reference image.
I don’t really fit in that well here at times because I don’t consider Capitalism as having anything to do with governance. Capitalism is a market system that uses competition to drive efficiency of creation of satisfaction of needs and luxuries both. If your democratic system of laws is being leveraged by highly efficient non-state entities, then you should really fix that shit, but fixing it doesn’t require abolishing private property nor would that end corruption.
I still wonder if North and South Dakota got more OSHA inspectors after he revealed the two states were sharing 8.
I wasn’t sure if this fit the sub that well, but they went up about 2 hours ago and I thought it was neat.
Ironically, Cauliflower has even less say in becoming wings than a chicken.
You didn’t bonk the room, though. You bonked me.
Read the room, pal, some people are choosing Ass World.
The hard part is getting people to run for office, getting funding for the campaign, organizing events and groups and managing staff to accomplish the goal of getting on the ballot and even then having a chance of winning is a bit of a long shot.
And worst of all, if you’re less moderate than the adjacent party then you’re going to split the vote of that party’s constituents and lead to the opponent’s party winning.
If they’re trying to convince Republicans to vote against Trump then they’ve chosen the wrong argument.