• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • You’re totally on point. Lemmy has a lot of people stuck in the past. It’s a significant bias.

    The store will garner good sales and the Tekken devs will eat well. This will be enabled by people who see value in their work and happily pay for it.

    It really doesn’t matter what a vocal minority thinks, when the valuable non-vocal minority is out there paying big bucks for Kazuya in a fundoshi.

    In order to reach new heights as a game service, Tekken needs all the money it can get.

    People also seem to forget that Tekken started off in arcades. These arcade releases were far more aggressive in their monetization, especially in Korea and Japan. You would have people paying 5-10$ for a couple of hours. Players would also have to pay for their online player IDs.

    Tekken 7 still had this business model. The game released for arcade in 2015. 2017 for all platforms.

    The game was thoroughly milked before it was more accessible.


  • Very much agreed, though I’m not looking to switch back. Reddit had gradually turned into a homogenous slurry of astroturf and toxic groupthink. Lemmy lacks the critical mass for both of these to become a problem.

    I still find Lemmy a better alternative, because at least I can see opinions that differ from mine. I’ll gladly throwdown and get my opinions challenged rather than feel that I don’t need to contribute to a discussion.









  • Dewded@lemmy.world
    cake
    toMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldEvery dang day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If one country begins sharing resources and wealth, it will get stomped by the others that don’t.

    Capitalism can’t be stopped without a violent revolt of colossal proportions. We’re talking billions of people dead, displaced or left vengeful. It’s a recipe for disaster.

    Peaceful options won’t work at global scale. Even if people begin to vote with their hearts en masse, it won’t change nations where voting is moot.

    I’m against violence, so the best I can see happening in my lifetime is me understanding and living with the system we inhabit and trying to alter what little I can in my small country for future generations.




  • Dewded@lemmy.world
    cake
    toMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldEvery dang day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    On a global scale you’re right.

    If we’re discussing the scope of a nation, strong enough tax laws and safeguards for unions prevent ludicrous growth within its own contained system. This can allow people to experience a reasonably fair society.

    Finland definitely is still benefiting off of cheap labour from poorer nations though. How to solve that especially if our country wants to retain its status, I would not know where to start. World domination?


  • Dewded@lemmy.world
    cake
    toMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldEvery dang day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m answering from the perspective of living in a country with functional democracy, so it’s hard to see the power the wealthy have over it.

    Lobbying and representative campaign funding are more transparent here. No party has majority seats alone, coalition governments are a necessity. Legislation is consensus driven.

    Finland is very much operating in a capitalism driven economy while still supplying its citizens socialism driven security.

    Capitalism is like fire. It’s a good tool, but a bad master. With appropriate legislative checks in place, it won’t get out of control.

    In the States it already has, but that doesn’t mean that capitalism is bad. Just that nobody was tending the fire.


  • Dewded@lemmy.world
    cake
    toMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldEvery dang day
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think exactly that way and am as left as you can be in the Finnish mainstream party system, with the exception of small sub-1% parties like the Communist Party.

    Landlords & Billionaires = living, breathing taxation waiting to happen

    Even if we were to tax a billionaire by 80%, they would probably still be a billionaire. However, they would also indeed be creating jobs, wealth and sustainable growth. School systems, medicine, hospitals, city infrastructure, job placement programmes, you name it, they fund it.

    Corporate tax is also grossly under-utilized.

    Capitalism isn’t bad if you tax it hard and use the money for the welfare of citizens.