Nowadays everybody wants to talk like they got something to say but nothing comes out when they move their lips just a bunch of gibberish.
Yes next time he should just shove his opinion in his as and never express again so that some online clown don’t get his feels hurt 🤡
It is weird how invested you are in this.
I am sorry to have upset you by pointing out OP is spreading misinformation based on anecdotal evidence and not the content of the article.
Commenter provided ab opinion and provided the context for it…
What’s your problem here?
Some people hold the opinion that all Indigenous people are dangerous criminals. Some of those same people have first hand experience with a criminal who happens to be Indigenous.
Does the context of experience justify the opinion, even though it is not at all based in fact?
Is it problematic to make sweeping claims about an entire group of people and blame them for an incident without the facts to back it up?
Can you elaborate?
I just did.
None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works LOL
This may be of some use to you.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/elaborate
Which Government?
I already answered this one as well.
The gov typically need some sort of warrant, and they need approval from the country they’re requesting it from.
United States of America? Canada? North Korea? China? Australia? Saudi Arabia? South Africa? Brazil?
The point is the app was designed for secure communication, specifically from corrupt governments, which is why it is problematic to allow access to user data as long as the individual is breaking a law in that country.
Or to use the example from the top:
So who gets to pick what’s a lawful request and criminal activity? It’s criminal in some states to seek an abortion or help with an abortion, so would they hand out the IPs of those “criminals”? Because depending on who you ask some will tell you they’re basically murderers. And that’s just one example.
None of this is my opinion, it’s just how the world works LOL
Can you elaborate?
Not necessarily, but kinda. The gov typically need some sort of warrant and they need approval from the country they’re requesting it from.
Which Government?
Pardon my ignorance as this is my first time using the internet, but I am pretty sure that every Government on the planet does not use a universal set of laws or procedures for enforcement.
The country in which the perpetrator lives or the crime was committed. First time using the internet?
In your opinion, all companies must disclose the personal information of customers whenever a Government says “This person broke the law”?
“the stress of the job, the long working hours, the traumatic events such as seeing abused people or dead bodies and severe assaults slowly took a toll on my physical and mental health.”
Being an ex-cop in prison is much worse for ones physical and mental health, and I am happy to hear buddy gets to find out first hand instead of getting off light.
Sounds to me like the Liberal Government is prepared for an early election.
The…law?
In which country?
Basing an opinion on anecdotal evidence without all of the facts presented is a dangerous thing to do.
Food for thought.
I missed the part of the article that spoke about the assailants coming from upper class upbringings.
In fact the victim and assailants weren’t named.
Where are you getting your information?
The prohibition of drugs is harmful.
When did I say it wasn’t?
Do try not to quote me out of context this time.
Your position is asinine and wrong, which is the point of this entire thread.
What is my position?
edit oh like I said, you ignored the parts of the last comment which would humiliate you. you can try to ignore them to keep that thought away, but even when you delete the comments, the idiocy will remain. your need to up your rhetorical game.
Posted a comment and edited within 2 minutes because you forgot to attempt an insult, yet I am the one who is “provoked” and “angry”.
Stay mad homie.
I stand by everything I have said. Made clear by the lack of editing done.
Maybe stop quoting me out of context. You may understand why you are wrong.
You keep moving your goalposts.
The goal post was to answer the questions posed. You still haven’t and the posts haven’t moved.
It’s so easy to provoke you. All I need to do is to quote you back to yourself and you’ll get red in the face.
I think you may have reached a point beyond projection, in a realm known as total delusion. The only one provoked here is obviously you. Easily verified by you putting everything “important” in bold(pretentious much?), attacking anyone who responds to you, all while pretending you are some enlightened individual who just has to be listened to for the good of man kind.
Sorry to burst your bubble but you aren’t special, intelligent, or worth listening to. Which is why I continue to ignore what you are saying. Which I explicitly told you I was going to do.
I do have to give you some credit though. The fact you have kept this going for almost a week is rather impressive. Sad, but impressive.
I cannot wait for the next mess of a comment you decide to post!
Go ahead and stand by your words anytime you are ready. Feel free to copy paste my questions, and put the relevant rant that “answers” any one of them below the quoted question. If you can answer all four with what you have previously written in your comments I will go back and answer every single sentence you ended with a “?”.
Otherwise, I will just keep doing what I am doing. Which is showing this thread to my spouse, and anyone who finds chronically online nut jobs humorous, and laughing at you until we all get bored and move on with life.
On that note, there is a lot of hope that you will continue responding as we are drinking now and having a great time. If you do not mind continuing with whatever it is you are doing that would be greatly appreciated by approximately 5 people.
Cheers!
A bit ashamed you were wrong? It’s okay. It’s the internet. It’s full of people like you saying dumb shit they can’t back up and get flustered about. There’s nothing to be ashamed of.
I know it is hard, because I cannot find it in me to listen to you, but you should at least listen to yourself. ;)
Your commitment to this fantasy in your head is rather impressive, even if it is really sad.
You just have to reply, but you can’t address anything
Pot calling the kettle black much?
Nothing is stopping you from not replying.
I think you are missing the real question here. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
You asked for books. That was the first question you had,
From the top:
Did you ever stop to think that the propaganda you speak of is directly influenced by exactly what steeznson was speaking about?
First question asked.
Why do you believe that anti-drug propaganda only began in the 20th century?
Second.
Do you have anything other than wikipedia links to back your stance up? Say, a real study done on the impacts of anti-drug propaganda through the ages which demonstrates that the 20th century was the most militant with it?
Third.
Do you know what Religion is, and its impacts on anti-drug mentalities predating the 20th century?
Fourth.
Then you said this:
If you’re honestly interested, you can find tons of literature.
and I said, without posing a question:
Name 10 books on the subject including the authors.
A strong reader would notice the lack of “?” at the end of that sentence, meaning it wasn’t a “question”.
Do you understand how punctuation works?
Did you forget that I said I would be ignoring you moving forward? Which to clarify doesn’t mean I won’t respond. It means I will ignore what you are saying and respond to whatever catches my fancy. Which is obviously making you big mad.
I find it quite funny, which is the only reason I am choosing to continue. You are a joke to me and as long as you keep delivering the punchlines, I will keep coming back with responses that fire you up.
Can you quote the comment that demonstrates I am being “butthurt”?
Nothing in the article speaks about the class of the victim, assailants, or their parents.
Do you believe it is okay to blame a group of people for a violent attack before knowing it was carried out by that group of people?