Thereā€™s this rising narrative going around that if you ask specifically for a CIS partner, youā€™re a transphobe. That could be true for some people but itā€™s not fundamentally related to bigotry. Moreover, this narrative, the ā€œif you only want a CIS mate then that is prejudiceā€ is trampling on one of the most important rights a person can have: the right to choose who they want to get intimate with.

First of all, transmen are in fact men and transwomen are in fact women. Letā€™s get that out of the way. This isnā€™t a foot in the door for ā€œtrans this really isnā€™t thatā€ narratives. What this is about it is the freedom to choose who you want to be intimate with. That right is sancrosanct, it is absolutely inviolable.

And yes, thereā€™s plenty of issues that make transgender dating a special issue. If someone reveals their TG status they can be open to hate crimes and even deadly violence. However all marginalized groups are special in their own way. As a black man I donā€™t think itā€™s racist if a woman says she doesnā€™t want to date a black man. I face oppression, too. My class is special in its own way. One group isnā€™t more special than the other. None of us have the right to force ourselves upon those who donā€™t want to be intimate with us, even by omitting who we really are.

Really, if you have to deceive or hide who you are in order to date someone, do you really want to date them? I wouldnā€™t. Thatā€™s not fair to you and youā€™re denying them their right to choose who they want. What do you think will happen when the person wants a CIS mate and they discover the truth? Theyā€™re going to get pissed and dump you. Now you have to shame them into staying with you: ā€œIf you loved me for real this wouldnā€™t bother youā€ā€¦ thatā€™s not going to convince anyone. Theyā€™re either going to leave, or theyā€™ll resent you forever. Thatā€™s just how it is. You can be mad at that but thatā€™s about as effective as protesting the rising of the sun. Thereā€™s just no way to win once youā€™ve gone down that road.

ā€œI want a CIS mateā€ is not the same as ā€œtrans women are not womenā€ - one is a preference, the other is harmful prejudice. On the flip side CIS people who do date trans people shouldnā€™t be shamed for their choices either. A man should be free to date a trans woman and not catch flak about it. Trans people should be able to be openly trans and not face hate speech or threats to their well-being. This, without any exception whatsoever.

The fundamental fact is when you shame or worse abrogate peopleā€™s right to choose who they want to get intimate with, itā€™s not going to end well for you. All youā€™re going to get is people who resent being coerced or bullied to date people they donā€™t want to. And thatā€™s not something the country, or the world, will ever put up with. Except that right now, most people donā€™t imagine they can be labeled a transphobe just for wanting a CIS mate. And unpopular opinion: that should be nipped in the bud.

  • ThatGirlKylie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    27
    Ā·
    8 months ago

    Bc OP reduced someone down to their anatomy. Literally perfect woman and exactly their type is right in front of them. Cute face, slim waist with a big behindā€¦ but the only reason you donā€™t want to date them is bc of their anatomy? Thatā€™s the part where it moves across the line.

    You have reduced this person down to whatā€™s in their pants and not who they are, their personality, their hobbies, etcā€¦ you have reduced them to a feature of their body.

    Imagine if someone said I donā€™t want to date someone with a cleft lip bc if we have kids that could be passed down through genetics.

    Itā€™s the same thing here.

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      Well except you cant have a biological kid to pass down any traits with your selected partner so itā€™s not the same.

      • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        Ā·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Science has came a long way this hasnā€™t been true for decades. Just gotta be fine with a surrogate carrying the baby and/or have the $$$

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          A surrogate literally means they donā€™t have half the genetic material from one of the partners though and would still rely on a donated egg or sperm. If you want to have a child that is a mix of both partners that is still impossible. And people donā€™t have the money to drop of they just want a spouse to have kids with.

          Iā€™m just saying if someone wanted to do things naturally or with love of their partner, itā€™s impossible. And thus a reason to have restrictions.