A new federal ruling states human authorship remains an “essential part of a valid copyright claim”

  • ram@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember, AI generated work is in the public domain.

    That hasn’t been determined yet. A human prompt used by the AI to generate content might be enough to grant copyright. This case is about autonomous AI generated content.

    • FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A prompt is not sufficient, in fact some image copyrights were revoked from Kristina Kashtanova when it was revealed that her involvement in generating the images was limited to providing AI prompts.

      She was only allowed to keep copyrights for work with more active involvement, namely text and layout.