During a major hearing this week, the conservative justices made clear theyāre about to gut the federal governmentās power to regulateāand take that power for themselves.
The Supreme Court heard two consolidated cases yesterday that could reshape the legal landscape and, with them, the country. The cases take on Chevron deferenceāthe idea that courts should defer to executive agencies when applying regulations passed by Congress. Theyāre the most important cases about democracy on the courtās docket this year, and I say that knowing full well that the court is also set to decide whether a raving, orange criminal can run again for president, and whether former presidents are immune from prosecution for their crimes in the first place.
Thatās because what conservatives on the court are quietly trying to do is pull off the biggest judicial power grab since 1803, when it elevated itself to be the final arbiter of the Constitution in Marbury v. Madison. Theyāre trying to place their unelected, unaccountable policy preferences ahead of the laws made by the elected members of Congress or rules instituted by the president. If conservatives get their way, elections wonāt really matter, because courts will be able to limit the scope of congressional regulation and the ability of presidents to enforce those regulations effectively. And the dumbest justice of all, alleged attempted rapist Brett Kavanaugh, basically said so during oral arguments.
Iām contractually obligated to tell you that the cases were technically about fees that fisheries are required to pay to federal observers. But all the justices talked about was Chevron deference. Only Justice Sonia Sotomayor even bothered to mention the fish, three hours and 20 minutes into a three-and-a-half-hour hearing.
Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, RBG - the three horsemen of the apocalypse.
Each one playing a crucial role in destroying our democracy because they selfishly thought they were the chosen ones.
Youād think the republicans, their voters, their donors, and the whole media apparatus behind it, would get some of the blame too. I know, theyāll see it as glory rather than blame. The dems didnāt do it, they were just lame.
Obvious ābut not equallyā comments aside, there does seem to be a lot of that going on lately. I can only hope that they each thought that they were doing the best that they could at the timeā¦ except that thought is somehow the most terrifying of all!? :-(
I wish I could rather live in a la-la land of make-believe conspiracy theories, like maybe there really is nobody in the entire USA who could possibly hold a candle to how smart, handsome, and all-around awesome Joe Biden is (ā¦in his own mind?); or it would be a relief actually to hear that his illuminati overloads commanded that he tank the election so as to allow a Republican to win (you know, rather than it being an oopsie that will bring all of America crumbling down along with it); or maybe aliens are actually real and itās so important for like uhā¦ the planetary war thatās currently going on that he alone be President, no other Democrats can possibly work for ahā¦ āreasonsā.
But most likely heās just old, thinks he really is the beeās knees or catās pajamas or whatever old-timey phrases they used back in his day, and heāll go right on thinking thatā¦ until he dies of a stroke or whatever. I am even willing to concede that the likelihood of that might be low - science is freaking awesome, and medical advancements are astonishingly ahā¦ advanced these days - but what I want to know is, why are we willing to gamble on that? And I mean, SO HARD that we arenāt even willing to hold primaries, in order to at least see what the other options might have been? Especially, as you pointed out, after we have tried that TWICE BEFORE in recent history and lost so hard that a 5 decade old foundational underpinning of human rights was lost in the process? Are we now trying to do double-or-nothing? (except if so, what could we possibly gain from that?)
Also, even if we take it as a given that he wins - which is at least somewhat likely b/c DT is even older so if Biden loses, it probably wonāt be his age that was the swing factor - what about after that, like why arenāt we raising up a new generation of Democratic hopefuls for the future, i.e. by letting them run in campaigns now? Then again, the last time we tried that things did not work out so well - the choices were the death of democracy, vs. a whole slew of jokers that had no chance even against that somehow? :-( IS BERNIE SANDERS THAT SCARY TO THEM!?!?! Oh wait, I think I answered my own question there, nvm:-(.
Second only to conservatives, the worst aspect of politics is liberals. :-| Our āruling classā is so disconnected from reality at this point:-(.