If they could somehow monetize breathing, they would

  • deleted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I prefer socialism over capitalism.

    In socialism, I’d be poor and have no choice of what I buy or eat but I can live and afford having children.

    In capitalism, where you have freedom, the same rules applies to poor and rich citizens. The difference is that the rich can afford lawyers and are able to lobby to change/break the law on their favor. You don’t.

    This is how the cost of living would go 100% up and you wage increase by 1.34% each year.

    • razza856@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you do know that under a socialist system worker-owned companies would compete in the market right? you’d still have lots of choice lol

      • deleted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m interested to know more.

        Some people only think of bad vibes of the Soviet Union when anyone talk bad about capitalism.

        In my country, we have free healthcare, free education, livable wages, free market.

        We’re not capitalist tho. A mix of socialism and capitalism.

        100% communism is bad, 100% capitalism is bad, 100% socialism is bad.

        • bi_tux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think what you are reffering to as “not capitalist” is called social market economy, at least that’s what it’s called in german.

          Some economists also reffer to it as Rhein Capitalism, because it’s mostly used in europe and was important to prevent west german citizens from wanting communism.

          • deleted@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly!

            I just know it did exist.

            One good example is Germany. If the government didn’t phase out nuclear power as the citizens wanted they would have been in better place now.

            Sometimes voting and democracy isn’t ideal as it’s easy to influence people if you have enough resources.

            • bi_tux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I disagree, voting is always right, but there’s only an ideal outcome if the population is educated about the topic.

              If people would have realised, that the true worst power source is fosile fules, we’d have cheaper electricity and better co2 rates now.

              Same problem with power in austria btw, if some missinformed teens wouldn’t have tried to be important back then we’d be maybe fully selfsufficient regaeding power now.

  • bi_tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean they already monitize water in poor countries in Africa, so yeah.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How horrible! A profit motive attached to the extraction, purification, and provision of water!

      Some people make money they otherwise wouldn’t have and others drink clean water they otherwise wouldn’t have. Hell on earth!

      • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahh yes Nestlé, a small helpful company that is only looking for a little extra cash at the expense of large groups of people losing their native water rights in perpetuity.

          • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Old comment, but at least we get to use the water our municipalities take, or our local governments get to have and use the profits for that water.

            Instead, Nestlé ships it off and holds the profits, essentially robbing resources permanently from people that are just trying to survive. There’s an argument I’m infantalizing people, but still.