It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

  • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    these kinds of conflicts of interests need to be disclosed properly, clearly and up front, and folks need to be critical until its sufficiently peer reviewed

    whether other findings agree with these isnt relevant, its still extremely important that folks know that corporate interests might be colouring any given paper

    researchers in a given field are practically always going to have jobs with big players in those fields, but taking biases into account is still important for interpreting findings