• doingless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      63
      ·
      10 months ago

      Probably because their crimes paled compared to riots in major cities in the previous few years. How many of the people who took over Seattle are in prison? There was federal property there.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m pretty sure trying to overthrow the federal government doesn’t compare to any riot in the last few decades, let alone years. Or, you know, ever.

      • SoleInvictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I can’t believe you’ve honestly thought through this idea that protestors who caused admittedly significant property damage and disruption are worse than protestors who intended to overthrow the government.

        I find paraphrasing arguments helps you see if they make sense. Think about making that argument in court. “Sure the defendant intended to sabotage the election, but these other guys trashed a car and occupied a park! That’s definitely worse!”

        • doingless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not bought in to this train of thought but I know many who are. I would say that I don’t think most people on the right think the protest was an attempt to overthrow the government though. They think it was a protest of what they perceived to be a stolen election. Obviously there were people involved with more nefarious intent though.

          I know exactly one person who was there (that I know of), she’s a sweet retired little old lady who bought into the stolen election rhetoric and just went there to protest. Which is protected speech and shouldn’t be demonized as a blanket as if everyone there wanted to overthrow the govt.

          Attempting to overthrow the govt doesn’t actually pale to what happened in Seattle but the level of violence involved actually did.

      • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yep, not a single person was arrested. https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/thousands-gather-capitol-hill-solidarity-with-demonstrations-portland/STVDEK5XUJHWLL2HQZT2NWDYVY/

        I love this talking point every time it is brought up.

        Yes there has been civil unrest. Yes there have been violent actors involved who have often turned an intended peaceful protest into a riot.

        People do get arrested at these events. Many are convicted for crimes.

        Protests are a form of civil unrest, they are not an attempt to take over or stop official, constitutionally prescribed procedures. J6 was a seditious action.

        Here are a few more items to educate yourself on, and there are many other examples that show the fallacy in your what-about-ism about all the violent rioters who walked away.

        https://www.police1.com/george-floyd-protest/articles/man-sentenced-to-4-years-for-minneapolis-police-station-fire-nKd5RboPPFKRy53f/

        https://thehill.com/homenews/news/522509-feds-say-far-right-group-coordinated-attack-on-minneapolis-police-precinct/

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Nobody took over Seattle you muppet. I live here and I’m pretty sure I would have noticed.

      • Lavitz@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        One was for equal rights and the other was to overthrow the federal government. A lot of the perceived leniency for the protesters was due to the brutal arrests and a lack of Miranda rights. Don’t forget that they shot at the protesters and not the insurrectionists. The sentences were not out of the kindness of the judges hearts, it was due to the unlawful arrests.

        Federal property was also involved in the insurrection so I don’t really follow your argument.

      • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Seattle is about 88 sq miles. A bunch of people blocked off 1/4 of 1% of 1 sq mile and mostly had a hippy dippy protest that didn’t harm anyone. During multiple days there were a few incidents during which a tiny number of people hurt each other or did bad shit and people were in fact charged.

        Meanwhile Jan 6th was about overthrowing democracy and installing a dictator. An act which would almost certainly have lead to civil war, killed millions, and destroyed out economy. You need some perspective.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        their crimes paled compared to riots

        Does a riot

        Okay, yes, sure. But it wasn’t like when THOSE PEOPLE do riots.