dancingsnail@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoReality for thee, not for mei.imgur.comimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1675arrow-down153
arrow-up1622arrow-down1imageReality for thee, not for mei.imgur.comdancingsnail@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareYa_Boy_Skinny_Penis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoOh so you “isolated the stats” then. Great, share them!
minus-squareVikingHippie@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoEven though it doesn’t seem like you’re gonna argue in good faith, here’s a review of a book about it.
minus-squareYa_Boy_Skinny_Penis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoOh God, I don’t even know where to start. How do you “argue in good faith” with someone who cites a book revire as evidence? And then you bother to look at the book reviee and it says nothing about winning at trial/after charging due to wealth?
Oh so you “isolated the stats” then.
Great, share them!
Even though it doesn’t seem like you’re gonna argue in good faith, here’s a review of a book about it.
Oh God, I don’t even know where to start. How do you “argue in good faith” with someone who cites a book revire as evidence? And then you bother to look at the book reviee and it says nothing about winning at trial/after charging due to wealth?