• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Except food is still extremely expensive, and real peoples dollars arent worth more, or getting paid more. The economic data doesnt seem to take into account things that actually matter to people who dont wear suits and golf.

    • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The thing is, a lot of these “rich people” metrics have indirect effects on “normal people” metrics. So yes, while saying “the economy is good” doesn’t mean much right now, it means that normal people will hopefully not struggle as much soon.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Oh nice, trickle down economics. Its cool to see someone who hasnt seen the sun on 4 decades, how are ya feelin bud? Thats not been an economic statement anyone takes seriously in a very long time

        E: this message is 5 days old, why am I only just now getting notifications about it?

        Oooh, the delayed notifications are all from the same instance. Interesting, I guess my instance lagged on touching base with your instance? Thats really odd.

    • roscoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You keep saying that, but that’s not what the data shows. It shows real wage growth is exceeding inflation. It’s also starting to show deflation across several categories of goods.

      It sucks your wages haven’t kept up with inflation and maybe eggs at your grocery store aren’t any cheaper, but the data shows that your experience isn’t typical.

      The typical experience is surprisingly good and getting better.

      • AtariDump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You keep saying that, but that’s not what the data shows. It shows real wage growth

        For the already wealthy

        is exceeding inflation.

        Fixed it for you.

        TL;DR - Don’t be a poor.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, you keep saying the data doesnt match reality, but last time the economy went to shit the data told us we were living a lie for 6 months before, magically, the data matched what everyone had been saying for a half year.

        You think maybe, the data is fucking bullshit? Again?

        Like how unemployment, the measured statistic, doesnt actually measure the unemployed? Just the recently fired who file for active job searching, and only for a specific window of time before they stop counting even if they are still jobless?

        You think maybe, yet again, they are lying via statistics to try and make things sound good right before an election year? Since the data contradicts reality, and reality doesnt seem to give a shit?

        • roscoe@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Don’t put words in my mouth. I never said the data doesn’t match reality. I’m saying the data is reality, or are least the best measure of it we have.

          You’re the one insisting that your experiences are the only measure of reality, and since the data doesn’t agree, it must be bullshit, instead of the much more likely explanation that your experiences aren’t typical.

          I’m not sure what you’re referring to with the “6 months” thing, but if you’re talking about the inflation rate spiking, the data wasn’t wrong, the interpretation was. The data showed inflation up, every month, but the Fed thought it was “transitory”. Eventually they realized “oh shit” it’s not transitory and took action to bring it down while trying not to cause a recession at the same time. I’m no fan of the Fed in general, but credit where it’s due, it looks like they did a damn good job.

          I’m well aware of all the various measures of unemployment, and they’re very good. Both short and long term unemployment are below what used to be considered maximum employment, and have been for a while. Underemployment is historically low. And after controlling for boomers aging out, workforce participation is trending upward. More people are working, more people are working full time, in jobs they’re trained for (as opposed to having to take jobs they’re overqualified for), and their wages are growing faster than inflation.

          No, I don’t think there is a vast conspiracy of thousands of federal workers, normal career employees, not political appointees, publishing fake numbers. The raw data is public and so is the origin. No one disagrees on what the numbers are, just what spin to put on it. Often, for political reasons, people will try to put a bad spin on good numbers, or a good spin on shitty numbers, but the numbers themselves are not in question.

          I think you’ve been taken in by someone who wants to put a bad spin on good numbers. Numbers so good, if you had told me you thought we’d be here a year ago I would have laughed in your face.

          Maybe, just maybe, the people doing well aren’t lying to you, there isn’t a conspiracy of government workers, and things are as all available data suggests.

          Maybe your experiences just aren’t typical.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pffft, if you think the way the american gov measures the unemployment stat is very good, its maybe not me with the atypical experience. Hard to take you seriously with a statement like that, good lord

            • roscoe@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              What else do you want? There are numbers for short-term, long-term, actively looking, stopped looking, workforce participation, and underemployed both part-time who want full-time and full-time in a low paying job because they can’t find anything in their field. They also have trends and more granular breakdowns in each category.

              Enlighten me, what else should be reported? People who wait tables but dream of being a movie star or pro athlete?

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It sucks your wages haven’t kept up with inflation and maybe eggs at your grocery store aren’t any cheaper, but the data shows that your experience isn’t typical.

        You still need the votes of those for whom wages have remained stagnant while their bills continue to rise. Brushing off people’s lived experience is pretty much directly telling them “you don’t matter.”