• gac11@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t the opposite true though as well? Can’t red states just make up reasons to remove biden if a conviction isn’t required?

      • ganksy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is insurrection specific so states would have the burden of proving (if they cared about proof) Biden was engaged with an insurrection.

      • agentsquirrel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, if they could identify an instance in which he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion […], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. Biden has never committed such an offense, so in order for red states to attempt this they’d have to fabricate facts and have a sufficient number of state officials go along with it, essentially The Big Lie 2.0.