• electrorocket@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most of the time it’s more economical to tear them down than to convert them. The plumbing work needed is probably the most expensive part but then you only have windows along the outside walls. I suppose you could have large common areas in the center.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the story they’re selling but I don’t think it really holds water. Sure, they’ll have to remove the fitout and upgrade the plumbing and that costs money but no more than anyone would expect when building apartments. Some office buildings won’t be suitable for residential use due to their shape and they obviously won’t be converted but most are suitable and they’ll be fine.

      The business lobby pointing at the ones which are unsuitable and saying “but this whole thing is going to be impossible!” looks disingenuous to me. There are plenty of good options and there’s no reason to expect they won’t be converted.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        These kinds of topics always get the “if it doesn’t work for every single use case, it’s useless”.

        This is a case by case kind of thing, each building should be examined and choose the appropriate new use for it.