• AmberPrince@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    For real. The tankie problem here is crazy. I can say something like China is trying to deny freedom of navigation of international waters on the South China Sea and somehow it becomes “BuT aMeRiCa”. I don’t get it.

    • reddwarf@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been seeing this a lot from instances like hexbear and lemmygrad and my take is either cult members, paid trolls, brainwashed persons prone to pavlovian responses, or all of the above.

      I just wish that as a user I could block instances.

      • Menachem@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely all of the above.

        Hexbear is particularly vexing to me. According to the fediverse observer they’re less than a month old and yet have already become one of the most active instances.

        • LiberalSoCalist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          hexbear has existed and been building their userbase for 3 years, but during that time their codebase diverged greatly from mainline lemmy to include in-house tweaks and features which made it not possible to federate, and it’s only within the past month that they got everything compatible

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t unique to the far-left, though. It’s a problem throughout the entire political spectrum.

        It’s rather dangerous to be creating echo chambers in a democracy, though. Democracy lives off of discourse between opposing views.

        • AmberPrince@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democracy lives off of discourse between opposing views.

          The inference here is that both views are of equivalent merit which is very much not true. This idea is called The Paradox of Tolerance. If a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually ceased or destroyed by the intolerant.

          • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except… That’s not what democracy relies on. Democracy relies on discourse of views, even if they are unpopular. Tolerating only the prevailing opinion isn’t a democracy, it’s an autocracy.

            • Gsus4@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, in practice, there are always limits to the discussion. Something like a constitution, a set of shared base beliefs that allow people to have the same base language to engage in a productive discussion, otherwise it turns into a mob discussing whether the vaccines work or not and no conclusion is reached. In a controlled environment or in a parliament, it’s possible to have these wide-view from-first-principles discussions of society. Not in mainstream media and certainly not online, as you’ve probably seen in any unmoderated forum.

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would not call them far left tbh. There’s something else about them that irks me. It honestly feels more North Korean to me and that ain’t left by any stretch of the imagination. It seems to be more authoritarian minded.

          • AmberPrince@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Agreed. Tankies are right-wing authoritarians in that communism is supposed to be stateless. They bitch about US imperialism but are always very quiet about China’s actions in Africa. It’s frustrating because like I get it. America has some pretty deep problems but to think that somehow it is worse than China is mindlessly reactionary.

            • Gsus4@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It would be funny if behind their firewall and the mandarin that I don’t understand much of there were a loud 25% of chinese nationalist weirdos who are as shitty as the 25% of american MAGAs. I mean, look at https://nitter.nl/TGTM_Official looks like 4chan.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      LOL, I just don’t even know what to say here. You do realize that when the Europeans subjugated China it was, in part, through naval superiority? Specifically, China did not have a blue ocean navy. China didn’t emerge from that subjugation until 1949, and then didn’t actually manage to do much more than stabilize it’s society in the subsequent years. FFS, Hong Kong was only returned to China from British domination and occupation in the late 1990s.

      China’s navy was developed under these conditions, after WW2, after the US nuked 2 civilian cities in the Pacific, after the US became the world super power, after the end of the USSR. China is the one who has been denied freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. When China pushes against the psychotic imperialist West and it’s proxies, that is not China denying freedom of navigation anymore than slaves revolting against their owners is the slaves denying their owners peace and prosperity.

      The entire concept of freedom of navigation is a relational one. Raising points about China while ignoring the relationship with the world super power who, under Obama, decided to move 60% of its military assets to the Pacific Theater, is just anemic thinking.

      • AmberPrince@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey look. A tankie that has no idea what the fuck they are talking about. I am shocked. Territorial waters are defined as 12 nautical miles typically from the shore. These are defined by the United Nations that China is a part of and agreed to. There is a reason why China is literally building fake islands to increase it’s territorial water claim there.

        • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Territorial waters are defined as 12 nautical miles typically from the shore

          BY WHOM IS IT DEFINED? You don’t need to answer the question here. We all know the answer. It’s the “rules-based international order”, you know, the one invented by white genociders that dominated and subjugated 80% of the world population. But do go on about how the definition of territorial waters is perfectly compatible with the US encircling China with nuclear capabilities, occupying much of the region, colonizing and subjugating various indigenous peoples on various islands so they can test weapons and prepare for war. It’s CHINA that’s being a problem.

          There is a reason why China is literally building fake islands to increase it’s territorial water claim there.

          Awww, what’s the matter? Are you upset when the fake rules that whitey made to dominate the globe are sometimes used by non-whites to game the system in small ways that show everyone just how vacuous and bankrupt the West really is?

          How about you focus on things like why China is even the UN at all, how the US refused to let the PRC into the UN and instead decided that the KMT should be at the UN despite the KMT prosecuting the White Terror and mass murdering people by the thousands for so much as suggesting that maybe they should end the civil war officially and integrate with China now that the PLA had demonstrated they had the overwhelming majority of popular support.

          • AmberPrince@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I like that in all of your rambling, despite directly quoting me, you carefully evaded explaining why China would want to build fake islands and expand it’s territorial waters.

            • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What a loser response. It’s obvious to everyone why they want to expand their territorial waters - to push out the US and other North Atlantic fascists and create a defensible perimeter against US nuclear encirclement. It’s not like this is a secret. The secret is that treating it like a secret is a propaganda tactic to make something that is quite literally out in the open into something nefarious as a way of distracting from the fact that the reason they are doing it is because the USA is a mass murdering fascist regime

              • AmberPrince@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                So what you’re saying is, China is trying to deny freedom of navigation in the South China Sea? If you agree with me why are we even having this discussion.

                • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because they are projecting force into their own sphere of influence to displace North Atlantic genocidal maniacs but you seem to be saying that this cannot stand and China must be stopped.