Hi,

I know this is quite impossible to diagnose from afar, but I came across the posting from lemmy.world admins talking about the attacks they are facing where the database will get overwhelmed and the server doesn’t respond anymore. And something similar seemed to have happened to my own servers.

Now, I’m running my own self-hosted Lemmy and Mastodon instances (on 2 seperate VPS) and had them become completely unresponsive yesterday. Mastodon and Lemmy both showed the “there is an internal/database error” message and my other services (Nextcloud and Synapse) didn’t load or respond.

Login into my VPS console showed me that both servers ran at 100% CPU load since a couple of hours. I can’t currently SSH into these servers, as I’m away for a couple of days and forgot to bring my private SSH key on my Laptop. So, for now I just switched the servers off.

Anyway, the main question is: what should I look at in troubleshooting when I’m back home? I’m a beginner in selfhosting and I run these instances just for myself and don’t mind if I’d have to roll them back a couple days (I have backups). But I would like to learn from this and get better at running my own services.

For reference: I run everything in docker containers behind Nginx Proxy Manager as my reverse proxy. I have only ports 80, 443 and 22 open to the outside. I have fail2ban set up. The Mastodon and Lemmy instances are not open for registration and just have 2 users each (admin + my account).

  • SuperFola@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One could setup a VPN and expose the SSH port to the VPN network only. It think tailscale operates this way?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue with this is that if the VPN breaks, you can’t SSH in to fix it, which is a problem if it’s a remote host.

      Instead, disable password authentication, use a strong (Ed25519) key, and configure two-factor auth (TOTP or FIDO2).

    • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure about the feasibility of this (my first thought would be that ssh on the host can be accessed directly by IP, unless maybe the VPN software creates its own network interface and sshd binds on it?), but this does not remove the need for frequent updates anyway, as openssh is not the only software that could have bugs : every software that opens a port should be protected as well, and you can’t hide your webserver on port 80 behind a VPN if you want it to be public. And it’s anyway a way more complicated setup than just doing updates weekly. :)

      • SuperFola@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, this doesn’t remove the need to stay up to date.

        However, it works on my server and was very easy to setup: a few ufw rules so that port 22 is blocked everywhere, allowed only on the VPN IP range and my local network range. Nmapping from outside does not show port 22 accessible, and indeed you can’t SSH to it without the VPN.

        Security is quite tough to get right eh? I tried my best to harden everything opening ports on my server, having a fail2ban, VPN for maintenance, webserver to expose some personal services…

        • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh, ok, you whitelist IPs in your firewall. That certainly works, if a bit brutal. :) (then again, I blacklist everyone who is triggering a 404 on my webserver, maybe I’m not the one to speak about brutality :P ) You don’t even need a VPN, then, unless you travel frequently (or your ISP provides dynamic IP, I guess).

          • SuperFola@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well that’s a bit of both: I need to be able to get on my server from work (with my phone… Yeah not great but that works), because I often break stuff haha ; also a nice thing to have when I’m on the bus and want to add more music or movies to listen to during the travel!

            Are there ISPs that don’t provide dynamic IPs? I had to setup a script and get some API keys for different services to ensure the IP is properly updated on my DNS servers.

            Speaking of brutality, I considered doing the same but then I would have banned myself from testing the APIs of my services 🤧

            • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh, I see. Totally makes sense. :)

              I guess it depends on the country, but here in France, yes, most landline ISPs provide static IPs (maybe all? there are a couple I haven’t try ; mobile IPs are always dynamic, though). It was not always the case, but I haven’t had a dynamic IP since the 2000’. I feel you, dealing with pointing a domain to a dynamic IP is a PITA.

              Ahah, yeah, I protected myself against accidentally banning my own IPs. First, my server is a Pi at home, so I can just plug a keyboard and a screen to it in case of problem. But more importantly, as I do that blacklisting through fail2ban, I just whitelisted my IPs and those of my relatives (it’s the ignore_ip variable in /etc/fail2ban/jail.conf)., so we never get banned even if we trigger fail2ban rules (hopefully, grandma won’t try to bruteforce my ssh!). It allowed me to do an other cool stuff : I made a script ran through cron that parses logs for 404 and checks if they were generated by one of the IPs in that list, mailing me if it’s the case. That way, I’m made aware of legit 404 that I should fix in my applications.