• Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    No, being horrible is not expected or accepted. The Puritans (read: Evangelicals) like to interpret it that way, and in fact they do that because it absolves them of personal responsibility. “Well, I don’t do that one really terrible thing, therefore I can feel secure and not worry about my behavior.”

    In reality, sin just means error, imperfection. It’s an acknowledgement that no human can be perfect the way that God is perfect, no matter what. The correct response to this should be ongoing self-evaluation, humility, and caution against slipping into the many easy faults of humanity. We should all be repenting constantly because obviously we make mistakes all the time, and all we can do is keep trying to be better, do better. This is what you find in classical literature like Thomas Kempis’s The Imitation of Christ.

    If you see someone (and I know this is common) running around claiming absolute security in their righteousness with God, then you’re seeing a person who is quite literally actively sinning.

    The knock on effect of this whole situation is that Christians who don’t believe they know all and speak for God (another sin: taking the Lord’s name in vain) don’t get public attention because we don’t run around shouting at people about our religious beliefs.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s an acknowledgement that no human can be perfect the way that God is perfect, no matter what.

      Does the scriptures speak towards why God is perfect, and why we’re imperfect?

      Specifically, if we’re made in God’s image, then doesn’t that mean God is not perfect either, or that we were purposely made imperfectly?

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Does the scriptures speak towards why God is perfect, and why we’re imperfect?

        This is a close cousin to the problem of pain. Many smarter people than I have debated both around and around for centuries, and come no nearer an answer than when they started. The Bible gives us a how, and a who, but not a why. Honestly I wish there was more, but alas.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      And who created this definition that you’re referencing? You speak as if it’s the authority on what is and isn’t Christian.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Kempis is a very storied and well-respected theologian from right before the Reformation. He’s looked upon fondly by the Anglicans, Methodists, and Jesuits alike. He’s about as Christian as they come, and the fruit of his belief is abundant.

          • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thomas Kempis is very much Christian. There are a variety of Christian authors in this vein. Modern American Evangelicalism doesn’t comprise the entirety of religious thinking.

              • Chetzemoka@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Again, I’m not debating. But I do find the irony interesting.

                And who created this definition that you’re referencing? You speak as if it’s the authority on what is and isn’t Christian.

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I feel like you’re missing the irony…

                  You cannot say who is or isn’t Christian any more than I can. Just because you reference those YOU see as an authority didn’t make you correct. It simply moves the problem one step to the left. Those people also can’t say who is or isn’t Christian.

                  There is no metric by which you can measure who is a Christian. At best you can say that some people don’t act as you would expect Christians to act. But that’s just your option, and says more about your beliefs than them.