• Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    That makes zero sense, if you’re collecting data then you don’t take action as that spoils the experiment. If you’ve collected the data then you know the results and should start fixing things.

    At no point during this situation is there a decade or so for populations to ‘explode’.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Dead furbearers are no longer a part of the population due to the means of sampling, trapping. So they’ve been removed from the population.

          • Vegoon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Maybe this could work for a higher acceptance for mass shootings too, if the victims are not killed but removed from the population.

          • Devi@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ew. ‘Sampling’ as killing now? And ‘furbearers’? Animals are being killed by humans, for fur. Using different words just shows how uncomfortable people are with what’s happening.