nuff said

  • kep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nobody is talking about it, but does that advertising exec that Musk hired for CEO take a massive hit to her career for any of this?

    It seems surreal to have a ghost CEO who isn’t responsible for anything such a large company does. But that’s exactly what’s happening here.

    • offbyone@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe, but there’s a market out there for CEOs who are willing to take the blame for some unpopular decisions and then walk away. There’s also something to be said that “-50%” might actually be an improvement over where it was before she was hired, and the bad decisions weren’t hers.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m thinking Stephen Elop.

        BTW, fuck him and MS so bad for ruining a tech company I could really make no complaint about.

        Especially if you think that Nokia didn’t only make good phones, they also were the major force behind Qt toolkit. And that was in Qt3 times, when Qt was unarguably cool.

      • kep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But that’s the thing. She isn’t taking the L on this. That’s my point. She seems to just be chillin’, doing fuck all. Everyone knows it’s Musk running it.

        This isn’t a case where he needed to bring in a fall guy CEO for a difficult business choice. This is a case where he brought in a new CEO to literally save the corporation, and she’s doing nothing and nobody is blaming her. It’s surreal.