A mother and her 14-year-old daughter are advocating for better protections for victims after AI-generated nude images of the teen and other female classmates were circulated at a high school in New Jersey.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the country, officials are investigating an incident involving a teenage boy who allegedly used artificial intelligence to create and distribute similar images of other students – also teen girls - that attend a high school in suburban Seattle, Washington.

The disturbing cases have put a spotlight yet again on explicit AI-generated material that overwhelmingly harms women and children and is booming online at an unprecedented rate. According to an analysis by independent researcher Genevieve Oh that was shared with The Associated Press, more than 143,000 new deepfake videos were posted online this year, which surpasses every other year combined.

  • DarkGamer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I live in America, and let me tell you we love lawsuits, for better or worse. If you’re referring to at will employment states we’re beyond my expertise, I am not a lawyer.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yep. Again, I am not a lawyer, but I imagine that your example might be a case for wrongful termination as Sexual harassment, which is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          How is terminating someone for having done porn sexual harassment? Please show the law code which defines it that way since you’re looking up legal issues.

          • DarkGamer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            " I am not a lawyer" x2
            “Okay, cite legal code like you’re a lawyer”"

            Really?

            Is it hard to imagine that bringing in deep fake porn into the office, wrongfully accusing someone of being a porn star, then firing them because of it might be considered sexual harassment?