• toasteecup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I wouldn’t say it’s dishonest. I should say it’s discussion with the evidence that lead op to their point.

    Using their data and our data leads us to an agreeable middle ground.

    • Danny M@lemmy.escapebigtech.infoOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I was referring to his edit which is:

      Edit: Oh god… It’s Rossman. Of course it’s dishonest.

      And my argument was that it’s fine to disagree with him (especially if you have conflicting evidence), but I don’t think that it’s warranted to call Rossmann dishonest


      By the way, I don’t even necessarily disagree with his main opinion, the video title is clickbaity for sure

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You know that’s fair and I appreciate your follow up. I personally need to do some research on Rossman so for that thank you